Table 3

Rheumatologist's preferences for a treatment choice in a patient with moderate and high disease activity

Patient profileModerate disease activityHigh disease activity
Attributes and levelsEstimate
(95% CI)
Relative contribution of attributesEstimate
(95% CI)
Relative contribution of attributesComparison between patient profiles (p Value)
Efficacy47.7%56.9%
 Moderate responseReference levelReference level
Good response1.57* (0.92 to 2.22)1.97* (1.17 to 2.77)0.02
Remission2.77* (1.70 to 3.85)3.25* (2.00 to 4.51)0.01
Safety12.9%11.2%
 Very rareReference levelReference level
 Rare−0.32† (−0.69 to 0.05)−0.29 (−0.71 to 0.13)0.62
 Uncommon−0.75* (−1.22 to −0.29)−0.64‡(−1.14 to −0.14)0.34
Patient's preference15.0%10.7%
 Treatment favoured0.46* (0.20 to 0.71)0.51* (0.24 to 0.78)0.63
 Patient is neutralReference levelReference level
 Treatment disfavoured−0.41* (−0.62 to −0.20)−0.10 (−0.29 to 0.10)0.03
Cost-effectiveness
(10 000 EUR/QALY)
−0.10* (−0.16 to −0.04)10.3%−0.07‡ (−0.12 to −0.01)7.4%0.15
Overall medication costs
(1000 EUR/year)
−0.06* (−0.09 to −0.04)14.1%−0.06* (−0.09 to −0.03)13.8%0.82
Constant−0.12 (−0.62 to 0.38)−0.18 (−0.78 to 0.42)
  • In bold: Significant (significant at ≤5%) heteroscedasticity in preferences when changing disease severity of patient.

  • *Significant at 1%.

  • †Significant at 10%.

  • ‡ Significant at 5%.

  • QALY, quality-adjusted life year.