Table 3

Sensitivity analyses for diagnostic studies on ultrasound (‘halo’ sign) and MRI in comparison with clinical diagnosis for cranial giant cell arteritis (GCA) as reference standard

Number of patients
(number of studies)
LR+
(95% CI)
LR–
(95% CI)
Sensitivity
(95% CI)
Specificity
(95% CI)
Ultrasound
 Halo versus clinical diagnosis (main analysis)*605 (eight studies)17 19 20 23 25 28 30 31 19 (4.8 to 75.5)0.2 (0.1 to 0.4)77 (62 to 87)96 (85 to 99)
  Excluding high RoB studies*255 (four studies)25 28 30 31 16 (7.3 to 35.2)0.2 (0.1 to 0.3)86 (76 to 93)95 (89 to 98)
  Studies without GC*156 (four studies)19 20 25 28 4.0 (2.6 to 6.2)0.3 (0.2 to 0.7)73 (49 to 89)82 (75 to 87)
  Studies with high resolution device*‡292 (four studies)19 25 30 31 13.8 (3.9 to 48.2)0.1 (0.1 to 0.3)87 (77 to 93)94 (79 to 98)
  Suspected diagnosis well-defined§175 (three studies)25 28 31 11.5 (4.5 to 29.2)0.1 (0.1 to 0.3)89 (76 to 95)92 (83 to 97)
  Longitudinal studies§244 (four studies)19 25 28 31 7.5 (3.4 to 16.8)0.1 (0.1 to 0.3)88 (77 to 94)88 (78 to 94)
MRI
 MRI versus clinical diagnosis (main analysis)*509 (six studies)33–35 38–40 5.9 (3.4 to 10.3)0.3 (0.2 to 0.5)73 (57 to 85)88 (81 to 92)
  Excluding high RoB studies*†446 (five studies)33 34 38–40 6.8 (3.6 to 13)0.3 (0.1 to 0.6)75 (56 to 88)89 (82 to 93)
  Studies with high resolution device*‡260 (four studies)33 35 39 40 3.8 (2 to 7.5)0.4 (0.2 to 0.8)68 (44 to 85)82 (69 to 91)
  Suspected diagnosis§270 (three studies)33 34 38 8.7 (5 to 15.2)0.2 (0.1 to 0.3)82 (74 to 87)91 (84 to 95)
  Longitudinal studies§411 (three studies)34 38 40 7.5 (4.9 to 11.7)0.3 (0.2 to 0.4)75 (65 to 84)90 (85 to 93)
  • *Bivariate random-effects binomial generalised mixed model.

  • †High RoB was defined, in the case of concern on ≥5 RoB items or all 3/3 applicability items out of the QUADAS-2 tool.

  • ‡High resolution devices were defined as >12 MHz probes for ultrasound or 3T MRI machines.

  • §Univariate random-effects models.

  • longitudinal studies, studies with clinical diagnosis after follow-up as reference standard; LR, likelihood ratio; QUADAS-2, Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2; RoB, risk of bias; suspected diagnosis, studies with detailed definition of suspicion of giant cell arteritis included; without GC, studies without glucocorticoid treatment before performance of ultrasound.