Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing rheumatoid arthritis disease activity with ultrasound

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In practice, composite indices are used for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity evaluation. Despite valid and widely used, not rarely composite indices miss accuracy. Ultrasound (US) is more precise than clinical examination in synovitis appraisal. US-based disease activity estimation depends on the detection of synovitis. The most common synovitis abnormalities are proliferation, effusion, and neoangiogenesis. Gray scale ultrasound identifies synovial hypertrophy and effusion with its good soft tissue contrast. Additionally, power Doppler ultrasound depicts neoangiogenesis within synovia, remarking local inflammation. Several studies have combined local US findings to develop a patient level disease activity index. Most of them summed selected joint scores in an overall score of disease activity and evaluated its correlation with clinical composite indexes. To be incorporated into clinical practice, an overall US score must have some fundamental characteristics such as reproducibility, viability, and sensitivity to change over time. In global US score development, finding the joints that truly estimate individual disease activity is highly challenging. This article presents an up-to-date literature review on assessing RA disease activity with US and depicts the challenges in finding the perfect global US score.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Katchamart W, Bombardier C (2010) Systematic monitoring of disease activity using an outcome measure improves outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 37(7):1411–1415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Smolen JS, Landewe R, Breedveld FC, Dougados M, Emery P, Gaujoux-Viala C et al (2010) EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Ann Rheum Dis 69(6):964–975

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Smolen JS, Aletaha D (2011) Monitoring rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 23(3):252–258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson J, Caplan L, Yazdany J, Robbins ML, Neogi T, Michaud K et al (2012) Rheumatoid arthritis disease activity measures: American College of Rheumatology recommendations for use in clinical practice. Arthritis Care Res 64(5):640–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Bijlsma JW, Breedveld FC, Boumpas D, Burmester G et al (2010) Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis 69(4):631–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. van Tuyl LH, Felson DT, Wells G, Smolen J, Zhang B, Boers M (2010) Evidence for predictive validity of remission on long-term outcome in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. Arthritis Care Res 62(1):108–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gaujoux-Viala C, Mouterde G, Baillet A, Claudepierre P, Fautrel B, Le Loet X et al (2012) Evaluating disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: which composite index is best? a systematic literature analysis of studies comparing the psychometric properties of the DAS, DAS28, SDAI and CDAI. Joint Bone Spine 79(2):149–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Felson DT, Smolen JS, Wells G, Zhang B, van Tuyl LH, Funovits J et al (2011) American College of Rheumatology/European League against rheumatism provisional definition of remission in rheumatoid arthritis for clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis 70(3):404–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rathbun AM, Reed GW, Harrold LR (2012) The temporal relationship between depression and rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, treatment persistence, and response: a systematic review. Rheumatology, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ranzolin A, Brenol JC, Bredemeier M, Guarienti J, Rizzatti M, Feldman D et al (2009) Association of concomitant fibromyalgia with worse disease activity score in 28 joints, health assessment questionnaire, and short form 36 scores in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 61(6):794–800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jousse-Joulin S, d’Agostino MA, Marhadour T, Albert JD, Bentin J, Chary Valckenaere I et al (2010) Reproducibility of joint swelling assessment by sonography in patients with long-lasting rheumatoid arthritis (SEA-Repro study part II). J Rheumatol 37(5):938–945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Le Boedec M, Jousse-Joulin S, Ferlet JF, Marhadour T, Chales G, Grange L (2013) Factors influencing concordance between clinical and ultrasound findings in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 40(3):244–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lillegraven S, Prince FH, Shadick NA, Bykerk VP, Lu B, Frits ML et al (2012) Remission and radiographic outcome in rheumatoid arthritis: application of the 2011 ACR/EULAR remission criteria in an observational cohort. Ann Rheum Dis 71(5):681–686

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Damjanov N, Radunovic G, Prodanovic S, Vukovic V, Milic V, Simic Pasalic K et al (2012) Construct validity and reliability of ultrasound disease activity score in assessing joint inflammation in RA: comparison with DAS-28. Rheumatology (Oxford) 51(1):120–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dougados M, Jousse-Joulin S, Mistretta F, Agostino MA, Backhaus M, Bentin J (2010) Evaluation of several ultrasonography scoring systems for synovitis and comparison to clinical examination: results from a prospective multicentre study of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 5:828–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Naredo E, Bonilla G, Gamero F, Uson J, Carmona L, Laffon A (2005) Assessment of inflammatory activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparative study of clinical evaluation with gray scale and power Doppler ultrasonography. Ann Rheum Dis 64(3):375–381

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Backhaus M, Burmester GR, Gerber T, Grassi W, Machold KP, Swen WA et al (2001) Guidelines for musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis 60(7):641–649

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Thiele RG (2012) Ultrasonography applications in diagnosis and management of early rheumatoid arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 38(2):259–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wakefield RJ, Balint PV, Szkudlarek M, Filippucci E, Backhaus M, D’Agostino MA et al (2005) Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology. J Rheumatol 32(12):2485–2487

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Terslev L, Torp-Pedersen S, Qvistgaard E, Danneskiold-Samsoe B, Bliddal H (2003) Estimation of inflammation by Doppler ultrasound: quantitative changes after intraarticular treatment in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 62(11):1049–1053

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Weidekamm C, Koller M, Weber M, Kainberger F (2003) Diagnostic value of high-resolution B-mode and Doppler sonography for imaging of hand and finger joints in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 48(2):325–333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Naredo E, Gamero F, Bonilla G, Uson J, Carmona L, Laffon A (2005) Ultrasonographic assessment of inflammatory activity in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of extended versus reduced joint evaluation. Clin Exp Rheumatol 6:881–884

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schirmer M, Duftner C, Schmidt WA, Dejaco C (2011) Ultrasonography in inflammatory rheumatic disease: an overview. Nat Rev Rheumatol 7(8):479–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Terslev L, Ellegaard K, Christensen R, Szkudlarek M, Schmidt WA, Jensen PS et al (2012) Head-to-head comparison of quantitative and semiquantitative ultrasound scoring systems for rheumatoid arthritis: reliability, agreement, and construct validity. Rheumatology (Oxford) 51(11):2034–2038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schueller-Weidekamm C (2009) Quantification of synovial and erosive changes in rheumatoid arthritis with ultrasound—revisited. Eur J Radiol 71(2):225–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Scheel AK, Hermann KG, Kahler E, Pasewaldt D, Fritz J, Hamm B et al (2005) A novel ultrasonographic synovitis scoring system suitable for analyzing finger joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 52(3):733–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Terslev L, Torp-Pedersen S, Qvistgaard E, von der Recke P, Bliddal H (2004) Doppler ultrasound findings in healthy wrists and finger joints. Ann Rheum Dis 63(6):644–648

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Szkudlarek M, Court-Payen M, Jacobsen S, Klarlund M, Thomsen HS, Ostergaard M (2003) Interobserver agreement in ultrasonography of the finger and toe joints in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 48(4):955–962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ribbens C, Andre B, Marcelis S, Kaye O, Mathy L, Bonnet V et al (2003) Rheumatoid hand joint synovitis: gray scale and power Doppler US quantifications following antitumor necrosis factor-alpha treatment: pilot study. Radiology 229(2):562–569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Filippucci E, Iagnocco A, Salaffi F, Cerioni A, Valesini G, Grassi W (2006) Power Doppler sonography monitoring of synovial perfusion at the wrist joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab. Ann Rheum Dis 65(11):1433–1437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Shio K, Homma F, Kanno Y, Yamadera Y, Ohguchi Y, Nishimaki T et al (2006) Doppler sonographic comparative study on usefulness of synovial vascularity between knee and metacarpophalangeal joints for evaluation of articular inflammation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated by infliximab. Mod Rheumatol 16(4):220–225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Naredo E, Collado P, Cruz A, Palop MJ, Cabero F, Richi P et al (2007) Longitudinal power Doppler ultrasonographic assessment of joint inflammatory activity in early rheumatoid arthritis: predictive value in disease activity and radiologic progression. Arthritis Rheum 57(1):116–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Naredo E, Rodriguez M, Campos C, Rodriguez-Heredia JM, Medina JA, Giner E et al (2008) Validity, reproducibility, and responsiveness of a 12-joint simplified power Doppler ultrasonographic assessment of joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 59(4):515–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hameed B, Pilcher J, Heron C, Kiely PD (2008) The relation between composite ultrasound measures and the DAS28 score, its components and acute phase markers in adult RA. Rheumatology (Oxford) 47(4):476–480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Backhaus M, Ohrndorf S, Kellner H, Strunk J, Backhaus TM, Hartung W et al (2009) Evaluation of a novel 7-joint ultrasound score in daily rheumatologic practice: a pilot project. Arthritis Rheum 61(9):1194–1201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ellegaard K, Torp-Pedersen S, Terslev L, Danneskiold-Samsoe B, Henriksen M, Bliddal H (2009) Ultrasound color Doppler measurements in a single joint as measure of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis–assessment of concurrent validity. Rheumatology (Oxford) 48(3):254–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Haavardsholm EA, Ostergaard M, Hammer HB, Boyesen P, Boonen A, van der Heijde D et al (2009) Monitoring anti-TNFalpha treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: responsiveness of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography of the dominant wrist joint compared with conventional measures of disease activity and structural damage. Ann Rheum Dis 68(10):1572–1579

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ziswiler HR, Aeberli D, Villiger PM, Moller B (2009) High-resolution ultrasound confirms reduced synovial hyperplasia following rituximab treatment in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 48(8):939–943

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Cheung PP, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Gossec L, Paternotte S, Le Bourlout C, Mazieres M et al (2010) Reliability of patient self-evaluation of swollen and tender joints in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison study with ultrasonography, physician, and nurse assessments. Arthritis Care Res 62(8):1112–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hammer HB, Sveinsson M, Kongtorp AK, Kvien TK (2010) A 78-joints ultrasonographic assessment is associated with clinical assessments and is highly responsive to improvement in a longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis starting adalimumab treatment. Ann Rheum Dis 69(7):1349–1351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kamishima T, Sagawa A, Tanimura K, Shimizu M, Matsuhashi M, Shinohara M et al (2010) Semiquantitative analysis of rheumatoid finger joint synovitis using power Doppler ultrasonography: when to perform follow-up study after treatment consisting mainly of antitumor necrosis factor alpha agent. Skeletal Radiol 39(5):457–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Larche MJ, Seymour M, Lim A, Eckersley RJ, Petavy F, Chiesa F et al (2010) Quantitative power Doppler ultrasonography is a sensitive measure of metacarpophalangeal joint synovial vascularity in rheumatoid arthritis and declines significantly following a 2-week course of oral low dose corticosteroids. J Rheumatol 37(12):2493–2501

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kawashiri SY, Kawakami A, Iwamoto N, Fujikawa K, Satoh K, Tamai M et al (2011) The power Doppler ultrasonography score from 24 synovial sites or 6 simplified synovial sites, including the metacarpophalangeal joints, reflects the clinical disease activity and level of serum biomarkers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 50(5):962–965

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Vlad V, Berghea F, Libianu S, Balanescu A, Bojinca V, Constantinescu C et al (2011) Ultrasound in rheumatoid arthritis: volar versus dorsal synovitis evaluation and scoring. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Hartung W, Kellner H, Strunk J, Sattler H, Schmidt WA, Ehrenstein B et al (2012) Development and evaluation of a novel ultrasound score for large joints in rheumatoid arthritis: one year of experience in daily clinical practice. Arthritis Care Res 64(5):675–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Watanabe T, Takemura M, Sato M, Sekine A, Fukuoka D, Seishima M et al (2012) Quantitative analysis of vascularization in the finger joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using three-dimensional volumetric ultrasonography with power Doppler. Clin Rheumatol 31(2):299–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Scire CA, Montecucco C, Codullo V, Epis O, Todoerti M, Caporali R (2009) Ultrasonographic evaluation of joint involvement in early rheumatoid arthritis in clinical remission: power Doppler signal predicts short-term relapse. Rheumatology (Oxford) 48(9):1092–1097

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Funck-Brentano T, Gandjbakhch F, Etchepare F, Jousse-Joulin S, Miquel A, Cyteval C, et al. Sonographic erosions and power-Doppler signal predict radiographic damage in early arthritis: The ESPOIR ultrasonography longitudinal study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Dec 4.

  49. Saleem B, Brown AK, Quinn M, Karim Z, Hensor EM, Conaghan P et al (2012) Can flare be predicted in DMARD-treated RA patients in remission, and is it important? A cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis 71(8):1316–1321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kume K, Amano K, Yamada S, Hatta K, Kuwaba N, Ohta H (2011) Very early improvements in the wrist and hand assessed by power Doppler sonography predicting later favorable responses in tocilizumab-treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 63(10):1477–1481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Naredo E, Wakefield RJ, Iagnocco A, Terslev L, Filippucci E, Gandjbakhch F et al (2011) The OMERACT ultrasound task force—status and perspectives. J Rheumatol 38(9):2063–2067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Mandl P, Naredo E, Wakefield RJ, Conaghan PG, D’Agostino MA (2011) A systematic literature review analysis of ultrasound joint count and scoring systems to assess synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis according to the OMERACT filter. J Rheumatol 38(9):2055–2062

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ohrndorf S (2012) Backhaus M. Advances in sonographic scoring of rheumatoid arthritis, Ann Rheum Dis

    Google Scholar 

  54. Aletaha D, Alasti F, Smolen JS (2011) Rheumatoid arthritis near remission: clinical rather than laboratory inflammation is associated with radiographic progression. Ann Rheum Dis 70(11):1975–1980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Brown AK, Quinn MA, Karim Z, Conaghan PG, Peterfy CG, Hensor E et al (2006) Presence of significant synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis patients with disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-induced clinical remission: evidence from an imaging study may explain structural progression. Arthritis Rheum 54(12):3761–3773

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Saleem B, Brown AK, Keen H, Nizam S, Freeston J, Karim Z et al (2009) Disease remission state in patients treated with the combination of tumor necrosis factor blockade and methotrexate or with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a clinical and imaging comparative study. Arthritis Rheum 60(7):1915–1922

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Saleem B, Brown AK, Keen H, Nizam S, Freeston J, Wakefield R et al (2011) Should imaging be a component of rheumatoid arthritis remission criteria? A comparison between traditional and modified composite remission scores and imaging assessments. Ann Rheum Dis 70(5):792–798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Peluso G, Michelutti A, Bosello S, Gremese E, Tolusso B, Ferraccioli G (2011) Clinical and ultrasonographic remission determines different chances of relapse in early and long-standing rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 70(1):172–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ozgocmen S, Ozdemir H, Kiris A, Bozgeyik Z, Ardicoglu O (2008) Clinical evaluation and power Doppler sonography in rheumatoid arthritis: evidence for ongoing synovial inflammation in clinical remission. South Med J 101(3):240–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. van Tuyl LH, Vlad SC, Felson DT, Wells G, Boers M (2009) Defining remission in rheumatoid arthritis: results of an initial American College of Rheumatology/European League against rheumatism consensus conference. Arthritis Rheum 61(5):704–710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Wakefield RJ, D’Agostino MA, Naredo E, Buch MH, Iagnocco A, Terslev L et al (2012) After treat-to-target: can a targeted ultrasound initiative improve RA outcomes? Ann Rheum Dis 71(6):799–803

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Professor Jorge Chakr for the proofreading.

Disclosures

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafael Mendonça da Silva Chakr.

Additional information

Author contributions

All authors were involved in drafting the article and/or revising it critically for major intellectual approach. The authors approved the final version to be published.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chakr, R.M.d.S., Mendonça, J.A., Brenol, C.V. et al. Assessing rheumatoid arthritis disease activity with ultrasound. Clin Rheumatol 32, 1249–1254 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-013-2291-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-013-2291-6

Keywords

Navigation