Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Consensus procedures and their role in pediatric rheumatology

  • Published:
Current Rheumatology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Delphi Technique and Nominal Group Technique are two well-recognized consensus-formation methodologies specifically designed to combine judgments from a group of experts. The Delphi Technique utilizes a series of well-defined questionnaire-based surveys, whereas Nominal Group Technique is a structured face-to-face meeting designed to facilitate consensus. Consensus-formation techniques require that each step build on the results of the previous steps. In this review, we describe these techniques, how they work, and their practical application in pediatric rheumatology, where they have been widely used to develop the outcome measures of several chronic rheumatic diseases, including juvenile idiopathic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, as well as the classification criteria for juvenile systemic sclerosis and juvenile vasculitides.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Delbecq AL, Van de Ven AH, Gustafson DH: Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes, edn 1. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dalkey NC: Delphi. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Helmer O: Analysis of the Future: the Delphi Method. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Giannini EH, Ruperto N, Ravelli A, et al.: Preliminary definition of improvement in juvenile arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1997, 40:1202–1209.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ruperto N, Ravelli A, Murray KJ, et al.: Preliminary core sets of measures for disease activity and damage assessment in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus and juvenile dermatomyositis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003, 42:1452–1459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jones J, Hunter D: Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ 1995, 311:376–380.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. van Teijlingen E, Pitchforth E, Bishop C, Russell E: Delphi method and nominal group technique in family planning and reproductive health research. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2006, 32:249–252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna HP: A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. Int J Nurs Stud 2001, 38:195–200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. McKee M, Priest P, Ginzler M, Black N: How representative are members of expert panels? Qual Assur Health Care 1991, 3:89–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lovell DJ, Giannini EH, Reiff A, et al.: Etanercept in children with polyarticular juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group. N Engl J Med 2000, 342:763–769.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ruperto N, Lovell DJ, Cuttica R, et al.: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of infliximab plus methotrexate for the treatment of polyarticular-course juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2007, 56:3096–3106.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ruperto N, Lovell DJ, Prieur AM, et al.: Efficacy and safety of abatacept in children and adolescents with active juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Ann Rheum Dis 2006, 65(Suppl 11):248.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ruperto N, Lovell DJ, Goodman S, et al.: 48-week data from the study of adalimumab in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA). Ann Rheum Dis 2006, 65(Suppl 11):56.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wallace CA, Ruperto N, Giannini E, et al.: Preliminary criteria for clinical remission for select categories of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol 2004, 31:2290–2294.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wallace CA, Huang B, Bandeira M, et al.: Patterns of clinical remission in select categories of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2005, 52:3554–3562.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ruperto N, Martini A: International research networks in pediatric rheumatology: the PRINTO perspective. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2004, 16:566–570.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Giannini EH, Brewer EJ, Kuzmina N, et al.: Methotrexate in resistant juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Results of the U.S.A.-U.S.S.R. double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group and the Cooperative Children’s Study Group. N Engl J Med 1992, 326:1043–1049.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Martini A, Ruperto N, Lovell DJ, et al.: An international consensus conference to define core sets of outcome measures for juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus and juvenile dermatomyositis. Proceedings of the Conference, March 31–April 3, 2001. Pavia, Italy: Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRINTO); 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ruperto N, Ravelli A, Cuttica R, et al.: The Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization criteria for the evaluation of response to therapy in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus: prospective validation of the disease activity core set. Arthritis Rheum 2005, 52:2854–2864.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ruperto N, Ravelli A, Pistorio A, et al.: The provisional Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation/American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Disease activity core set for the evaluation of response to therapy in juvenile dermatomyositis: a prospective validation study. Arthritis Rheum 2007, 59:4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ruperto N, Ravelli A, Oliveira S, et al.: The Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization/American College of Rheumatology provisional criteria for the evaluation of response to therapy in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus: prospective validation of the definition of improvement. Arthritis Rheum 2006, 55:355–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rider LG, Giannini EH, Brunner HI, et al.: International consensus on preliminary definitions of improvement in adult and juvenile myositis. Arthritis Rheum 2004, 50:2281–2290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Oddis CV, Rider LG, Reed AM, et al.: International consensus guidelines for trials of therapies in the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Arthritis Rheum 2005, 52:2607–2615.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ramanan AV, Schneider R, Batthish M, et al.: Developing a disease activity tool for systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis by international consensus using the Delphi approach. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005, 44:1574–1578.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zulian F, Woo P, Athreya BH, et al.: The Pediatric Rheumatology European Society/American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism provisional classification criteria for juvenile systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum 2007, 57:203–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ozen S, Ruperto N, Dillon MJ, et al.: EULAR/PReS endorsed consensus criteria for the classification of childhood vasculitides. Ann Rheum Dis 2006, 65:936–941.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolino Ruperto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruperto, N., Meiorin, S., Iusan, S.M. et al. Consensus procedures and their role in pediatric rheumatology. Curr Rheumatol Rep 10, 142–146 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-008-0025-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-008-0025-6

Keywords

Navigation