Skip to main content
Log in

The Natural Course of Radiographic Progression in Ankylosing Spondylitis: Differences Between Genders and Appearance of Characteristic Radiographic Features

  • Published:
Current Rheumatology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our study set out to analyze the radiographic progression of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients based on gender differences. A total of 146 AS patients were retrospectively blindly analyzed in at least 2 time points within 6 years using the modified Stokes AS Spine Score. The mean follow-up time was 3.8 ± 1.7 years, and 114 patients (78%) were male. The overall progression was similar between genders. Females showed higher progression in the cervical spine, and males in the lumbar spine. More females showed new cervical syndesmophytes, and more males showed new lumbar syndesmophytes. More females showed slow radiographic progression, and more males showed fast radiographic progression, while moderate progression was similar for both genders. Dorsal syndesmophytes showed no impact in the prediction of future progression. Female AS patients showed more cervical structural lesions, but male patients overall showed more rapid progress, leading us to conclude that dorsal vertebral edges do not add in depiction of radiographic deterioration in AS patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. Braun J et al. Prevalence of spondylarthropathies in HLA-B27 positive and negative blood donors. Arthritis Rheum. 1998;41(1):58–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Creemers MC et al. Assessment of outcome in ankylosing spondylitis: an extended radiographic scoring system. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(1):127–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wanders AJ et al. What is the most appropriate radiologic scoring method for ankylosing spondylitis? A comparison of the available methods based on the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials filter. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(8):2622–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Averns HL et al. Radiological outcome in ankylosing spondylitis: use of the Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (SASSS). Br J Rheumatol. 1996;35(4):373–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Spoorenberg A et al. Radiological scoring methods in ankylosing spondylitis. Reliability and change over 1 and 2 years. J Rheumatol. 2004;31(1):125–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Baraliakos X et al. Progression of radiographic damage in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: defining the central role of syndesmophytes. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(7):910–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Calin A et al. A new dimension to outcome: application of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index. J Rheumatol. 1999;26(4):988–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. •• Baraliakos X, et al. The natural course of radiographic progression in ankylosing spondylitis—evidence for major individual variations in a large proportion of patients. J Rheumatol. 2009;36(5):997–1002. This paper reports that radiographic progression in AS is variable, and many patients show high rates of progression. Only the prevalence of syndesmophytes at baseline is predictive of future damage.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Calin A, Elswood J. The relationship between pelvic, spinal and hip involvement in ankylosing spondylitis—one disease process or several? Br J Rheumatol. 1988;27(5):393–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. •• Rudwaleit M, et al. The early disease stage in axial spondylarthritis: results from the German Spondyloarthritis Inception Cohort. Arthritis Rheum, 2009;60(3):717–27. This paper shows that clinical manifestations and disease activity measures are highly comparable between patients with early nonradiographic axial spondylarthropathy and those with early AS. Male sex and elevated C-reactive protein levels are associated with structural damage on radiographs.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 1984;27(4):361–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gensler LS et al. Clinical, radiographic and functional differences between juvenile-onset and adult-onset ankylosing spondylitis: results from the PSOAS cohort. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67(2):233–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sieper J et al. Critical appraisal of assessment of structural damage in ankylosing spondylitis: implications for treatment outcomes. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(3):649–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Braun J et al. Analysing chronic spinal changes in ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic comparison of conventional x rays with magnetic resonance imaging using established and new scoring systems. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63(9):1046–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Baraliakos X et al. Assessment of acute spinal inflammation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): a comparison between contrast enhanced T1 and short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(8):1141–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Baraliakos X et al. Development of a radiographic scoring tool for ankylosing spondylitis only based on bone formation: addition of the thoracic spine improves sensitivity to change. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(6):764–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xenofon Baraliakos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baraliakos, X., Listing, J., von der Recke, A. et al. The Natural Course of Radiographic Progression in Ankylosing Spondylitis: Differences Between Genders and Appearance of Characteristic Radiographic Features. Curr Rheumatol Rep 13, 383–387 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-011-0192-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-011-0192-8

Keywords

Navigation