Abstract
Our study set out to analyze the radiographic progression of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients based on gender differences. A total of 146 AS patients were retrospectively blindly analyzed in at least 2 time points within 6 years using the modified Stokes AS Spine Score. The mean follow-up time was 3.8 ± 1.7 years, and 114 patients (78%) were male. The overall progression was similar between genders. Females showed higher progression in the cervical spine, and males in the lumbar spine. More females showed new cervical syndesmophytes, and more males showed new lumbar syndesmophytes. More females showed slow radiographic progression, and more males showed fast radiographic progression, while moderate progression was similar for both genders. Dorsal syndesmophytes showed no impact in the prediction of future progression. Female AS patients showed more cervical structural lesions, but male patients overall showed more rapid progress, leading us to conclude that dorsal vertebral edges do not add in depiction of radiographic deterioration in AS patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance
Braun J et al. Prevalence of spondylarthropathies in HLA-B27 positive and negative blood donors. Arthritis Rheum. 1998;41(1):58–67.
Creemers MC et al. Assessment of outcome in ankylosing spondylitis: an extended radiographic scoring system. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(1):127–9.
Wanders AJ et al. What is the most appropriate radiologic scoring method for ankylosing spondylitis? A comparison of the available methods based on the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials filter. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(8):2622–32.
Averns HL et al. Radiological outcome in ankylosing spondylitis: use of the Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (SASSS). Br J Rheumatol. 1996;35(4):373–6.
Spoorenberg A et al. Radiological scoring methods in ankylosing spondylitis. Reliability and change over 1 and 2 years. J Rheumatol. 2004;31(1):125–32.
Baraliakos X et al. Progression of radiographic damage in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: defining the central role of syndesmophytes. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(7):910–5.
Calin A et al. A new dimension to outcome: application of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index. J Rheumatol. 1999;26(4):988–92.
•• Baraliakos X, et al. The natural course of radiographic progression in ankylosing spondylitis—evidence for major individual variations in a large proportion of patients. J Rheumatol. 2009;36(5):997–1002. This paper reports that radiographic progression in AS is variable, and many patients show high rates of progression. Only the prevalence of syndesmophytes at baseline is predictive of future damage.
Calin A, Elswood J. The relationship between pelvic, spinal and hip involvement in ankylosing spondylitis—one disease process or several? Br J Rheumatol. 1988;27(5):393–5.
•• Rudwaleit M, et al. The early disease stage in axial spondylarthritis: results from the German Spondyloarthritis Inception Cohort. Arthritis Rheum, 2009;60(3):717–27. This paper shows that clinical manifestations and disease activity measures are highly comparable between patients with early nonradiographic axial spondylarthropathy and those with early AS. Male sex and elevated C-reactive protein levels are associated with structural damage on radiographs.
van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 1984;27(4):361–8.
Gensler LS et al. Clinical, radiographic and functional differences between juvenile-onset and adult-onset ankylosing spondylitis: results from the PSOAS cohort. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67(2):233–7.
Sieper J et al. Critical appraisal of assessment of structural damage in ankylosing spondylitis: implications for treatment outcomes. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(3):649–56.
Braun J et al. Analysing chronic spinal changes in ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic comparison of conventional x rays with magnetic resonance imaging using established and new scoring systems. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63(9):1046–55.
Baraliakos X et al. Assessment of acute spinal inflammation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): a comparison between contrast enhanced T1 and short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(8):1141–4.
Baraliakos X et al. Development of a radiographic scoring tool for ankylosing spondylitis only based on bone formation: addition of the thoracic spine improves sensitivity to change. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(6):764–71.
Disclosure
No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baraliakos, X., Listing, J., von der Recke, A. et al. The Natural Course of Radiographic Progression in Ankylosing Spondylitis: Differences Between Genders and Appearance of Characteristic Radiographic Features. Curr Rheumatol Rep 13, 383–387 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-011-0192-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-011-0192-8