Risk of hospitalized bacterial infections associated with biologic treatment among US veterans with rheumatoid arthritis

Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Jul;66(7):990-7. doi: 10.1002/acr.22281.

Abstract

Objective: The comparative risk of infection associated with non-anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologic agents is not well established. Our objective was to compare risk for hospitalized infections between anti-TNF and non-anti-TNF biologic agents in US veterans with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: Using 1998-2011 data from the US Veterans Health Administration, we studied RA patients initiating rituximab, abatacept, or anti-TNF therapy. Exposure was based upon days supplied (injections) or usual dosing intervals (infusions). Treatment episodes were defined as new biologic agent use. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for hospitalization for a bacterial infection were estimated from Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for potential confounders.

Results: Among 3,152 unique RA patients contributing 4,158 biologic treatment episodes to rituximab (n = 596), abatacept (n = 451), and anti-TNF agents (n = 3,111), the patient mean age was 60 years and 87% were male. The most common infections were pneumonia (37%), skin/soft tissue (22%), urinary tract (9%), and bacteremia/sepsis (7%). Hospitalized infection rates per 100 person-years were 4.4 (95% CI 3.1-6.4) for rituximab, 2.8 (95% CI 1.7-4.7) for abatacept, and 3.0 (95% CI 2.5-3.5) for anti-TNF. Compared to etanercept, the adjusted rate of hospitalized infection was not different for adalimumab (HR 1.4, 95% CI 0.9-2.2), abatacept (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.6-2.1), or rituximab (HR 1.4, 0.8-2.6), although it was increased for infliximab (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-4.0). Infection risk was greater for those taking prednisone >7.5 mg/day (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.7) and in the highest quartile of C-reactive protein (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.4-3.8) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (HR 4.1, 95% CI 2.3-7.2) compared to the lowest quartile.

Conclusion: In older, predominantly male US veterans with RA, the risk of hospitalized bacterial infections associated with rituximab or abatacept was similar to etanercept.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Abatacept
  • Aged
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived / adverse effects
  • Antirheumatic Agents / adverse effects*
  • Arthritis, Rheumatoid / complications*
  • Arthritis, Rheumatoid / drug therapy*
  • Arthritis, Rheumatoid / epidemiology
  • Bacterial Infections / epidemiology
  • Bacterial Infections / etiology*
  • Comorbidity
  • Female
  • Glucocorticoids / adverse effects
  • Hospitalization
  • Humans
  • Immunoconjugates / adverse effects
  • Incidence
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment
  • Rituximab
  • Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha / antagonists & inhibitors
  • United States / epidemiology
  • Veterans / statistics & numerical data

Substances

  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived
  • Antirheumatic Agents
  • Glucocorticoids
  • Immunoconjugates
  • Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
  • Rituximab
  • Abatacept