Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Original article
Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic effects and safety of verinurad in combination with febuxostat in adults with gout: a phase IIa, open-label study
  1. Roy Fleischmann1,
  2. Peter Winkle2,
  3. Jesse Hall3,
  4. Shakti Valdez3,
  5. Sha Liu3,
  6. Xiaohong Yan3,
  7. Liz Hicks3,
  8. Caroline Lee3,
  9. Jeffrey N Miner3,
  10. Michael Gillen4 and
  11. Martha Hernandez-Illas5
  1. 1 Southwestern Medical Center, Metroplex Clinical Research Center, University of Texas, Dallas, Texas, USA
  2. 2 Anaheim Clinical Trials, Anaheim, California, USA
  3. 3 Ardea Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, California, USA
  4. 4 AstraZeneca LP, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
  5. 5 QPS MRA (Miami Clinical Research), Miami, Florida, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Roy Fleischmann; rfleischmann{at}arthdocs.com

Abstract

Objective Verinurad (RDEA3170) is a high-affinity, selective URAT1 inhibitor in development for treating gout and asymptomatic hyperuricaemia. This study evaluated the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and safety of verinurad in combination with febuxostat in adults with gout.

Methods The phase IIa, open-label, multicentre study randomised 64 subjects into one of five cohorts to receive febuxostat (40 or 80 mg) alone or in combination with verinurad 2.5–20 mg. Serial plasma/serum and urine samples were assayed for verinurad and uric acid. Safety was assessed by adverse events, chemistry panels, ECGs and physical examinations.

Results Serum pharmacodynamic data demonstrated the maximum percent decrease in serum urate (sUA) from baseline (Emax) at 8–12 hours after dosing. Verinurad with febuxostat decreased sUA in a dose-dependent manner. Emax for verinurad with febuxostat 40 mg ranged from 52% to 77% vs 42% for febuxostat 40 mg alone; Emax for verinurad with febuxostat 80 mg was 62%–82% vs 55% for febuxostat 80 mg alone. Urinary uric acid excretion rate was reduced below baseline by febuxostat alone and was comparable to baseline for verinurad with febuxostat. Verinurad plasma exposure increased with dose and was comparable when combined with febuxostat. No drug-drug interactions were observed. Verinurad was well tolerated with no clinically meaningful changes in laboratory values.

Conclusion Verinurad administered with febuxostat produced dose-dependent decreases in sUA while maintaining urinary uric acid levels comparable to baseline. These dose combinations of verinurad and febuxostat were generally well tolerated. These data support continued investigation of oral verinurad in patients with gout.

Trial registration number NCT02246673

  • febuxostat
  • gout
  • verinurad

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors RF, PW, JH, SV, SL, XY, LH, CL, JNM, MG, MH-I: acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data for the work; drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published. JH, SL, CL, JNM, MG: conception and design of the work.

  • Funding Funding for this study was provided by Ardea Biosciences/AstraZeneca.

  • Competing interests RF received a clinical study grant from Ardea Biosciences. PW is a full-time employee of Anaheim Clinical Trials. JH, SV, SL, XY, LH, CL and JNM are/were full-time employees of Ardea Biosciences, a member of the AstraZeneca Group at the time of this study. MG is a full-time employee of AstraZeneca.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Ethics approval The protocol, protocol amendments and consent forms were approved by an Independent Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board (Schulman Associates IRB, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement De-identified patient data from this study are made available for scientific research on a case-by-case basis through AstraZeneca’s Data Request Portal: https://astrazenecagroup-dt.pharmacm.com//DT/Home/Index/