Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Original article
Implementation and role of modern musculoskeletal imaging in rheumatological practice in member countries of EULAR
  1. Peter Mandl1,
  2. Anna Ciechomska2,
  3. L Terslev3,
  4. Xenofon Baraliakos4,5,
  5. PG Conaghan6,
  6. Maria Antonietta D'Agostino7,
  7. Annamaria Iagnocco8,
  8. Conny J van der Laken9,
  9. Mikkel Ostergaard10 and
  10. E Naredo11
  1. 1 Department of Rheumatology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  2. 2 Department of Rheumatology, Wishaw General Hospital, Wishaw, UK
  3. 3 Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark
  4. 4 Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Sankt Josefs-Krankenhaus, Herne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
  5. 5 Rheumatology Department, Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
  6. 6 Rheumatology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
  7. 7 Rheumatology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, APHP, Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
  8. 8 Scienze Cliniche e Biologiche, Università degli Studi di Torino, Rome, Italy
  9. 9 Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
  10. 10 Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
  11. 11 Department of Rheumatology, Joint and Bone Research Unit, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz and Autónoma University, Madrid, Spain
  1. Correspondence to Dr Peter Mandl; peter.mandl{at}meduniwien.ac.at

Abstract

Objectives To document the current training, implementation and role of modern musculoskeletal imaging techniques: ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and positron emission tomography, among rheumatologists in the member countries of the EULAR.

Methods English-language questionnaires for each imaging modality developed by a EULAR task force were sent out to national and international scientific societies as well as imaging experts in the given modalities involved in research and/or training. The surveys were distributed via an online survey tool (SurveyMonkey). Simple descriptive and summary statistics were calculated from the responses.

Results More than 90% of ultrasound (US) experts reported the availability of a US unit in their department. Suspicion of rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritides were the main clinical indications for performing US for diagnostic purposes. Suspicion of sacroiliitis and degenerative spine disease were the most common indications to perform magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) for diagnostic purposes, while positron emission tomography was mainly performed to diagnose large vessel vasculitis and to investigate fever of unknown origin. The reported percentage of rheumatologists performing US was highly variable, ranging from more than 80% in 6% of countries to less than 10% in 15% of countries. The majority of experts (77%) reported that their national rheumatology societies organise musculoskeletal US courses, while courses in MRI or CT organised by the national rheumatology societies were less commonly reported (29% and 8%, respectively).

Conclusions Rheumatologists in Europe utilise modern imaging techniques; however, access to the techniques and training offered is varied.

  • health services research
  • MRI
  • ultrasonography

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors PM and EN contributed to the study design, managed the study, collected and interpreted clinical data, drafted the manuscript and approved the final version. AC, PGC, XB, MAD, AI, CJvdL and MO contributed to the study design, interpretation of data, revised the manuscript and approved the final version.

  • Funding Funding for the SurveyMonkey account was provided by the EULAR (Project number: IMG014).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.