This clinical case series describes our experience with the use of Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor baricitinib in two patients suffering from refractory adult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD) as well as in one case suffering from AOSD-like autoinflammatory disease in the context of myelodysplastic syndrome. All patients suffered from disease non-responsive to conventional Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) as well as biological therapies including interleukin (IL)-1 and IL-6 blockade, relying instead on high daily doses of prednisolone. We also report the first case of Pneumocystis jirovecii infection following baricitinib use.
- Ankylosing Spondylitis
- Psoriatic Arthritis
- Adult Onset Still’s Disease
- Fever Syndromes
- DMARDs (biologic)
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
- Ankylosing Spondylitis
- Psoriatic Arthritis
- Adult Onset Still’s Disease
- Fever Syndromes
- DMARDs (biologic)
Adult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD) is a rare systemic autoinflammatory disorder characterised by a combination of fever, generalised evanescent salmon-pink rash, pharyngodynia, arthritis/synovitis, lymphadenopathy, serositis and splenomegaly. None of these clinical features are disease-specific, and a wide spectrum of conditions including autoimmune, infectious and malignant diseases need to be considered as part of differential diagnosis. Several classification criteria have been developed for research purposes that can aid the diagnosis of AOSD. The most commonly used are Yamaguchi’s1 and Fautrel’s2 criteria with the latter one not requiring exclusion of other conditions for diagnosis of AOSD to be made. The diagnosis can be particularly difficult in patients with pre-existing conditions such as myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or in patients who do not fulfil all classification criteria, but have a condition closely resembling AOSD and who are ultimately treated and respond to therapies used for AOSD. A frequently used diagnostic label in such cases is that of undifferentiated systemic autoinflammatory syndrome (uSAID).3
Treatment of AOSD has been revolutionised by the introduction of biologicals DMARD particulary those targeting interleukin (IL)-1 and IL-6.4–7 The Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors—tofacitinib, baricitinib and others—are highly effective in refractory inflammatory arthritis, including patients who have failed biological therapy.8 9 Here, we describe our experience using the JAK-1/JAK-2 inhibitor baricitinib in two patients with biological-resistant AOSD meeting Yamaguchi’s diagnostic criteria, as well as in one patient suffering from an AOSD-like disorder in the context of low-grade MDS. Results of relevant investigations are shown in table 1, a summary of medications used (and their doses) are shown in table 2, and clinical characteristics, laboratory results and concomitant medication prebaricitinib and postbaricitinib implementation are shown in table 3.
A 43-year-old Sudanese woman (P1) was first treated at in Sudan (at 41 years) for fever and flitting arthralgia. She relapsed in the UK despite maintenance therapy with prednisolone and hydroxychloroquine, presenting with fever, arthritis/synovitis and evanescent rash in the context of neutrophilia and elevated inflammatory markers. She remained steroid-dependent (multiple unsuccessful tapers below 15 mg prednisolone daily) despite combination therapy with anakinra and ciclosporin or methotrexate. Anakinra was briefly replaced with two-weekly intravenous tocilizumab infusions but was restarted due to primary non-response. The disease evolved into a predominantly oligoarthritic phenotype with significant synovial hypertrophy of both 2nd metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints, multiple proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) joints and both knee supra-patellar pouches. In addition, there was evidence of bilateral tibialis posterior and extensor carpi ulnaris tenosynovitis with evidence of multiple early bone erosions on ultrasound. Baricitinib was started at this point and the patient has remained in clinical and biochemical remission while on baricitinib monotherapy over the ensuing 15 months.
A 32-year-old Caucasian male (P2) presented at 29 years with a flitting inflammatory polyarthritis (affecting hands, wrists, elbows, shoulders and knees) associated with a non-pruritic, evanescent rash, fevers, rigours and sweating. The condition was responsive to high-dose prednisolone. A diagnosis of AOSD was made and steroid-sparing immunomodulatory therapy was initiated with ciclosporin, with methotrexate added subsequently. Anakinra was added as prednisolone requirement remained at least 15 mg/day, with marked initial improvement but subsequent relapses despite doubling and then tripling the dose. Two-weekly intravenous tocilizumab was commenced in combination with methotrexate, resulting in complete biochemical and partial clinical response. After 6 months, he developed a persistent urticaria-like rash, which improved only transiently with the anti-IgE therapeutic, omalizumab. The patient developed severe synovitis and baricitinib was added without improvement. After 9 months, both drugs were discontinued. Since then, the patient has received one cycle of rituximab (to no effect) and more recently infliximab with modest improvement in symptoms.
A 63-year-old Caucasian woman (P3) was diagnosed with AOSD-like condition (uSAID) after presenting at 58 years with pharyngitis, fever and arthralgias. The patient had pre-existing myelodysplasia diagnosed 2 years previously. Haematologist input deemed that her symptoms were not due to MDS, which was low grade and according to the MDS International Prognostic Scoring System had low scores and therefore minimal possibility of malignant transformation. Her MDS has remained clinically unchanged to this date. The initial flare was treated with high-dose corticosteroids. DMARDs were omitted due to the patient’s MDS. She was established on two-weekly intravenous tocilizumab monotherapy, successfully resulting in complete symptomatic control for 4 years. Subsequently, the patient developed chilblain vasculitis, deemed to have been caused by IL-6 blockade itself (and replicated after receiving subcutaneous sarilumab). The vasculitis, although seronegative, responded to rituximab, but AOSD symptoms remained problematic. A trial of anakinra failed due to intolerance; therefore, baricitinib was gradually introduced with careful monitoring. The patient has remained in biochemical and clinical remission for 9 months. At 7 months, she developed Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia, which responded to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and she remains on it prophylactically.
AOSD remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge due to its myriad clinical manifestations and the confounding effects of comorbidities, partially effective therapies and continually evolving phenotypes. Our experience with baricitinib in biological-resistant AOSD is highly variable, perhaps reflecting the varied clinical presentation of this disease. One patient had pre-existing MDS and subsequently developed a clinical syndrome, which clinically resembled AOSD. Considering that there was significant time interval (2 years) between diagnosis of MDS and eventual emergence of AOSD-like condition, it could be argued that this was simply coincidence, particularly since it is often considered that AOSD tends to precede an eventual diagnosis of malignancy.10 However, a number of studies have already reported that autoimmune/autoinflammatory conditions are more common in MDS than in the general population, although with no clear classification of these inflammatory disorders. The range of autoimmune/autoinflammatory disorders in patients with MDS is highly variable with a prevalence rate ranging from 7% to 30% according to the different studies.11 12 Therefore, it is also reasonable to assume that AOSD-like condition in P3 is possibly a complication of underlying MDS. Considering that a JAK1/2 inhibitor (ruxolitinib) is already used in haematology to treat myelofibrosis, P3 response to baricitinib might not be surprising. However, ruxolitinib is typically approved for the treatment of intermediate-risk and high-risk myelofibrosis and associated symptoms.13 Interestingly, P3 also developed an opportunistic infection with pneumocystis while on baricitinib, a complication previously described only once in the context of myelofibrosis therapy with ruxolitinib.
The response to baricitinib in two other patients with AOSD was mixed. Nonetheless, JAKi remains a promising therapeutic option for patients otherwise dependent on high-dose corticosteroids. A recent report from China describes the successful use of tofacitinib in 14 patients with AOSD; however, not all patients had a complete response and some were still needing to take steroids on a long-term basis.14 The success of JAKi in patients who have failed IL-1-directed and IL-6-directed therapies might be explained by the ability of these medications to block other likely relevant cytokines such as IL-12/IL-23 and interferon-γ. However, the optimal therapeutic dose of JAKi used for AOSD might be different from what is used for licenced indication. This point was illustrated by a recent report of baricitinb use in the treatment of interferonopathies by Sanchez et al where larger, treat-to-effect, dosages were used, raising the possibility of underdosing in our cases.15
What is already known about this subject?
Cytokine inhibition (IL-1 and IL-6) using bilogicals is now established treatment approach in AOSD.
What does this study add?
JAKi should be tried in patients who fail bilologics 3.
How might this impact on clinical practice?
Additional studies are needed to determine optimal place for use of JAKi in treatment AOSD.
Contributors Data collection—MK, JF. Preparing the manuscript—MK, SS. Contribution of clinical cases—MHB, AKG, DGM and SS. Manuscript editing and final approval—MK, JF, AKG MHB, DGM.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests Yes, there are competing interests for one or more authors and I have provided a Competing Interests statement in my manuscript.
Patient consent for publication Consent obtained directly from patient(s).
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement For further queries related to the cases presented here please contact the corresponding author.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.