PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Nicola Goodfellow AU - Julien Morlet AU - Surjeet Singh AU - Afsie Sabokbar AU - Andrew Hutchings AU - Vanshika Sharma AU - Jana Vaskova AU - Shauna Masters AU - Allahdad Zarei AU - Raashid Luqmani TI - Is vascular endothelial growth factor a useful biomarker in giant cell arteritis? AID - 10.1136/rmdopen-2016-000353 DP - 2017 Mar 01 TA - RMD Open PG - e000353 VI - 3 IP - 1 4099 - http://rmdopen.bmj.com/content/3/1/e000353.short 4100 - http://rmdopen.bmj.com/content/3/1/e000353.full SO - RMD Open2017 Mar 01; 3 AB - Objectives To assess the performance of circulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels as a tool for diagnosing giant cell arteritis (GCA) in a cohort of patients referred for assessment of suspected GCA.Methods We selected 298 patients recruited to the multicentre study Temporal Artery Biopsy versus Ultrasound in diagnosis of suspected GCA (TABUL). In a random subset of 26 biopsy-proven GCA cases and 26 controls, serum from weeks 0, 2 and 26 was analysed for VEGF concentration using ELISA. VEGF concentration at week 0 was used to generate a receiver-operating characteristic curve and thereby identify a cut-off for an abnormal result which was used to analyse the full patient cohort. Sections of paraffin-embedded temporal artery were stained by immunohistochemistry for VEGF.Results The mean (95% CI) VEGF concentration at week 0 was 873 pg/mL (631 to 1110) in 26 patients versus 476 pg/mL (328 to 625) in 26 controls (p=0.017). This difference was not observed at any other time point. The optimal cut-off of 713 pg/mL was applied to the whole patient cohort (n=298), yielding sensitivity of 32% and specificity of 85%. This was not improved by combination with any clinical parameters. When patients with biopsy-proven GCA were compared with controls, sensitivity was 58% and specificity remained 85%. Sections of biopsy from biopsy-positive GCA showed intense staining in the adventitia which was not seen in controls.Conclusions Serum VEGF concentration predicts biopsy positivity but is not useful for differentiating clinical cases of GCA from controls. Further studies into VEGF as a prognostic marker and therapeutic target are warranted.Trial registration number NCT00974883; Post-results.