PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Ovseiko, Pavel V AU - Gossec, Laure AU - Andreoli, Laura AU - Kiltz, Uta AU - van Mens, Leonieke AU - Hassan, Neelam AU - van der Leeden, Marike AU - Siddle, Heidi J AU - Alunno, Alessia AU - McInnes, Iain B AU - Damjanov, Nemanja S AU - Apparailly, Florence AU - Ospelt, Caroline AU - van der Horst-Bruinsma, Irene E AU - Nikiphorou, Elena AU - Druce, Katie L AU - Szekanecz, Zoltán AU - Sepriano, Alexandre AU - Avcin, Tadej AU - Bertsias, George AU - Schett, Georg AU - Keenan, Anne-Maree AU - Pololi, Linda H AU - Coates, Laura C TI - Gender equity in academic rheumatology, current status and potential for improvement: a cross-sectional study to inform an EULAR task force AID - 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002518 DP - 2022 Aug 01 TA - RMD Open PG - e002518 VI - 8 IP - 2 4099 - http://rmdopen.bmj.com/content/8/2/e002518.short 4100 - http://rmdopen.bmj.com/content/8/2/e002518.full SO - RMD Open2022 Aug 01; 8 AB - Objectives Evidence on the current status of gender equity in academic rheumatology in Europe and potential for its improvement is limited. The EULAR convened a task force to obtain empirical evidence on the potential unmet need for support of female rheumatologists, health professionals and non-clinical scientists in academic rheumatology.Methods This cross-sectional study comprised three web-based surveys conducted in 2020 among: (1) EULAR scientific member society leaders, (2) EULAR and Emerging EULAR Network (EMEUNET) members and (3) EULAR Council members. Statistics were descriptive with significance testing for male/female responses assessed by χ2 test and t-test.Results Data from EULAR scientific member societies in 13 countries indicated that there were disproportionately fewer women in academic rheumatology than in clinical rheumatology, and they tended to be under-represented in senior academic roles. From 324 responses of EULAR and EMEUNET members (24 countries), we detected no gender differences in leadership aspirations, self-efficacy in career advancement and work–life integration as well as the share of time spent on research, but there were gender differences in working hours and the levels of perceived gender discrimination and sexual harassment. There were gender differences in the ranking of 7 of 26 factors impacting career advancement and of 8 of 24 potential interventions to aid career advancement.Conclusions There are gender differences in career advancement in academic rheumatology. The study informs a EULAR task force developing a framework of potential interventions to accelerate gender-equitable career advancement in academic rheumatology.