Table 3

Randomised controlled trials of GC in GCA

Study IDStudy designGCA subtypenInterventionControlPrimary outcomeResults (i)Results (c)P value
Raine et al 70 2018Feasibility study, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded evaluatorNew 12
7 (i) vs 5 (c)
MR prednisolonePrednisolonePersistent clinical disease control week 266/74/5NA
Mazlumzadeh et al 71 2006Double-blind, placebo- controlled, randomised prospective controlled trialNew 27
14 (i) vs 13 (c)
GC i.v. 15 mg/kg/day for 3 days → 40 mg/day PRED p.o.i.v. saline for 3 days+40 mg/day PREDGC ≤5 mg/day week 3610/14 (71%)2/13 (15%)0.003
Cacoub et al 72 2001Double-blind, randomised prospective controlled trialNew 74
37 (i) vs 37 (c)
Prednisolone 0.7 mg/kg/dayDeflazacort (equivalent dose)Bone mass loss (g/cm2) month 120.026±0.0070.03±0.005NS
Chevalet et al 73 2000Randomised prospective controlled trial (not blinded)New 146
61 (i) vs 53 (c2) vs 50 (c3)
GC i.v. 240 mg → 0.7 mg/kg/day PRED p.o.(C2): 0.7 mg/kg/day PRED p.o.
-(C3): GC i.v. 240 mg → 0.5 mg/kg/day PRED p.o.
Mean cumulative PRED dose (mg) mo 1257775578 (c2); 5168 (c3)0.38
  • c, control; GC, methylprednisolone; GCA, giant cell arteritis; i, intervention; i.v., intravenous; mo, month; MR, modified release; NA, not applicable; New, newly diagnosed giant cell arteritis;NS, non-significant; p.o., oral route; PRED, prednisolone.