Table 3

Ways in which respondents would use mentoring

Total respondents, N (%)Post-docs,
N (%)
PhD students,
N (%)
P value
N*1288642
Developing research ideas79 (62)46 (54)33 (79)<0.01
Career development plan69 (54)43 (50)26 (62)0.21
Help with grant writing67 (52)48 (56)19 (45)0.26
Insight into career path65 (51)39 (45)26 (62)0.08
Access to resources outside of own institution65 (51)38 (44)27 (64)0.03
Goal setting59 (46)38 (44)21 (50)0.54
Help with networking58 (45)33 (38)25 (60)0.02
Mentoring expertise that cannot be found in own institution53 (41)37 (43)16 (38)0.60
Advice on when to say no44 (34)29 (34)15 (36)0.82
Help with teaching40 (31)25 (29)15 (36)0.45
Work/life balance39 (31)27 (31)12 (29)0.77
Visit mentor’s lab37 (29)26 (30)11 (26)0.64
Advice on time management37 (29)26 (30)11 (26)0.64
How to structure research team32 (25)21 (24)11 (26)0.82
Help with job search30 (23)23 (27)7 (17)0.21
Getting a job at the mentor’s institution28 (22)17 (20)11 (26)0.41
Help navigate political situations27 (21)21 (24)6 (14)0.19
Advice on switching careers23 (18)16 (19)7 (17)0.79
Help with contract negotiations20 (16)16 (19)4 (10)0.21†
Developing a business plan10 (8)8 (9)2 (5)0.30†
Advice on hiring staff7 (6)7 (8)0 (0)0.06†
Advice on setting up solo practice3 (2)1 (1)2 (5)0.25†
  • Respondents were asked to indicate in what ways they would use mentoring. Multiple responses were allowed. N(%) for each item was calculated. Differences between post-docs and PhD students.

  • *30 respondents did not answer question regarding ways in which them would use mentoring. The exclusion of these 30 respondents did not significantly change the baseline characteristics of the group.

  • †p-value from Fisher exact test.