Table 1

Results of the ERN ReCONNET survey on clinical practice guidelines adherence in rare and complex connective tissue disorders: the perspective of healthcare professionals

ERN-ReCONNET survey on the use of clinical practice guidelines for HCPs InstructionsThe survey should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses are completely anonymous. You can only take the survey once and all questions are required. The survey is designed to be compled by experts of the following diseases:
We really appreciate your input!
  • Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)

  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS)

  • Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM)

  • IgG4-related disease (IgG4)

  • Mixed connective tissue diseases (MCTD)

  • Relapsing polychondritis (RP)

  • Sjögren’s syndrome (SS)

  • Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Systemic sclerosis (SS)

  • Undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD)

Results
Your age %
 <25 years
 25–34 years21.4
 35–44 years33.9
 45–54 years26.8
 55–64 years17.9
 >65 years
Where do you work? %
 Austria
 Belgium6
 Bulgaria
 Croatia
 Cyprus
 Czech Republic
 Denmark
 Estonia
 Finland
 France16
 Germany8
 Greece
 Hungary
 Ireland
 Italy36
 Latvia
 Lithuania
 Luxembourg
 Malta
 Netherlands10
 Norway
 Poland2
 Portugal12
 Romania4
 Slovakia
 Slovenia4
 Spain2
 Sweden
 United Kingdom
Please select the option that best suits your healthcare provider (HCP) %
 General hospital3.6
 University hospital91.1
 Private hospital/healthcare service1.8
 Academic unit affiliated with general
hospital
1.8
 Mix of general and university hospital1.8
What is the volume of your centre? (the average number of rCTDs patients seen per year)%
 Fewer than 150 yearly3.6
 150–250 yearly3.6
 250–350 yearly10.7
 350–450 yearly5.4
 More than 450 yearly76.8
How many years have you been practising your specialty?
 <519.6
 5–1021.4
 10–1516.1
 >1542.9
How many physicians in your centre are actually working on rCTDs patients?
 <33.5
 3–516.1
 5–1041.1
 >1039.3
What is/are your main area of expertise? (more than one option possible) %
 APS46.4
 EDS3.6
 IIM42.9
 IgG414.3
 MCTD44.6
 RP16.1
 SS44.6
 SLE75.0
 SSc62.5
 UCTD39.3
Using well-constructed CPGs will improve patient care
From 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)
%
 1
 21.8
 31.8
 433.9
 562.5
CPGs would not improve the care I give to patients
From 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)
%
 141.1
 242.9
 37.1
 48.9
 50.0
I find it helpful to apply CPGs in clinical practice
From 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)
%
 10
 21.8
 35.4
 450.0
 542.8
Existing CPG in my area of expertise are very few or lacking From 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) %
 13.6
 217.9
 333.9
 437.5
 57.1
Existing CPG in my area of expertise are well constructed and valid
From 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)
%
 11.8
 230.4
 333.9
 432.1
 51.8
How often do you use CPG when assessing patients?%
 Never1.8
 Less than once a week16.1
 More than once a week37.5
 Always44.6
How often do you use CPG when diagnosing patients%
 Regularly82.1
 Occasionally10.8
 Never7.1
How often do you use CPG when considering treatment options?%
 Regularly87.5
 Occasionally12.5
 Never
How often do you use CPGs when monitoring patients?%
 Regularly67.9
 Occasionally30.4
 Never1.7
Do you experience any difficulties/barriers to the application of CPG in your HCP?%
 Yes62.5
 No37.5
If yes, please indicate which difficulties/barriers you experience to the application of clinical practice guidelines in your healthcare provider (more than one option possible)%
 Procedures and drug reimbursement57.1
 Time limit48.6
 Local legislative restrictions34.3
 Awareness/knowledge20.0
 Poor dissemination of guidelines17.0
Do you have any proposal to increase the adherence to the clinical practice guidelines? (open question)
  • CPGs, clinical practice guidelines; rCTDs, rare and complex connective tissue and musculoskeletal diseases.