Table 1

Design, outcomes and population of studies included in the manuscript

RQAuthor and yearObjectivePatientsProceduresOutcomes
RQ 1Humby et al
201815
Comparing across techniques:
  • ST yield/ST quantity

  • ST quality

125 patients:
  • RA (n=73)

  • UA (n=31)

  • PsA/SpA (n=18)

  • JIA (n=3)


Follow-up (n=34)
Synovial biopsies (n=159)
  • US-NB (n=47)

  • US-P&F (n=54)

  • Arthroscopy (n=35)

  • Blind NB (n=23)

Graded ST fragments/total ST fragments
Total mean graded ST area
Mean ST area per graded biopsy fragment
Total mean graded ST surface
Mean synovitis scores
Mean semiquantitative scores of synovial infiltration in sublining (SL) of CD20 +B cells; CD3 +T cells; CD68 +macrophages
Frequency of synovial pathotype
RNA quantity and RIN in small and large joints
Just et al
201816
Comparing across techniques:
  • Tolerance

  • Adverse events

421 patients
  • RA (n=360)

  • UA (n=20)

  • PsA/SpA (n=14)

  • Others (n=8)


Follow-up (n=103)
Synovial biopsies (n=524)
  • US-NB (n=402)

  • US-P&F (n=65)

  • Arthroscopy (n=57)

VAS: joint pain/joint swelling/stiffness
Delta VAS: joint pain/joint swelling/stiffness
‘How does joint feel compared with before biopsy’
Willingness to repeat: 1–5 Likert scale
Adverse events
RQ2Kraan et al
200217
Comparing in paired biopsies from small and large joints:
  • Cell infiltrate

  • IL-6 expression

9 RA patientsArthroscopic SB (n=18)
  • Knee (n=9)

  • Paired small joints (MCP: n=4; wrist: n=5)

Cell numbers per mm2 in lining layer (LL) and SL:
  • CD55 +fibroblast like synoviocytes

  • CD68 +macrophages

  • CD3 +T cells

  • CD138 +plasma cells


IL-6 expression (integrated optical density)
Musters et al
201818
Comparing in paired biopsies from right and left joints:
  • T-cell repertoire

9 RA patientsArthroscopic SB (n=18)
  • Paired left and right joints (ankle or knee)

Number of TCRβ clones
Number of highly expanded clones (HEC)
Impact of the HECs on the total repertoire
Overlap between the 25 most expanded TCRβ clones (%)
Chao-modified Sørensen index
Triaille et al
202019
Comparing in paired biopsies from small and large joints:
  • T-cell repertoire

  • T-cell signature

10 RA patientsSynovial biopsies (n=20)
  • Knee (n=10; arthroscopic SB)

  • Paired small joints (n=10; MCP or wrist; US-NB)

Synovitis scores
Mean semiquantitative scores of synovial infiltration of CD20 +B cells, CD3 +T cells and CD68 +macrophages
Number of transcripts overexpressed
Pathway expression patterns
Enriched T-cell clonotypes (ETC) and % of shared ETC
RQ3Donlin et al
201820
Comparing tissue handling methods:
  • Fresh vs cryopreserved tissue

  • Dissociation method

RA patientsSynovial biopsies (n=19)
  • US-NB (n=16)

  • Surgical biopsies (n=3)

Total cell counts per gram from ST mechanically disaggregated
Flow cytometry:
  • % of total CD90+, CD14+, CD3+, CD19 +cells

  • % viability

Smeets et al
200321
Comparing intra-articular variability of:
  • Cell infiltrate

  • MMPs

17 RA patientsArthroscopic biopsies (n=17)
Paired SB of 2 different sites of the knee (CPJ and SP recess)
Quantitative analysis of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD22, CD38, CD68, MMP-1 and granzyme B7 by computer-assisted image analysis.
Semiquantitative analysis of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD22, CD38, CD68, CD55, mast cells, MMP-1, MMP-3 and MMP-13
Kirkham et al
199922
Comparing intra-articular variability of:
  • Cell infiltrate

  • Cytokines expression

11 RA patientsArthroscopic biopsies (n=11)
Knee; 4 anatomically different sites: CPJ and SP, lateral and medial recesses
Semiquantitative analysis of CD3, CD8, CD45RO, Mac 387
Cytokine mRNA expression: IL-1β, TNF, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, GM-CSF, IFNγ
Weighted kappa coefficient
Musters et al
201818
Comparing intra-articular variability of
T-cell repertoire
13 RA patientsArthroscopie biopsies (n=7)
Knee; 2 anatomically different sites: SP and IP recesses
Number of TCRβ clones
Number of HEC
Impact of the HECs on the total repertoire
Overlap between the 25 most expanded TCRβ clones (%)
Chao-modified Sørensen index
Kennedy et al
198823
Minimal number of tissue fragments required to limit sampling error in large joints11 RA patientsSurgical biopsies (n=11)H&E, absolute value of cell density par high power field.
Number of tissue fragments to analyse to reduce sampling error
Boyle et al
200324
Minimal number of tissue fragments required to limit sampling error in large joints5 RA patientsSurgical biopsies (n=5)
Hip or knee
PBMC equivalent (cellular equivalents of expression (CE)) number for synovial samples
Relative expression (RE) of mRNA IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, MMP-1 CE and GAPDH CE
Number of biopsies required to limit sample error to <25% for each IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, MMP-1
Humby et al
201511
Minimal number of tissue fragments required to limit sampling error in small jointsRA patients
  • Assessment cohort (n=35)

  • Validation cohort (n=6)

Synovial biopsies (n=41)
  • Assessment cohort: US-NB (n=35)

  • Validation cohort: arthroscopic biopsies (n=3); surgical biopsies (n=3)

Semiquantitative analysis of CD20+, CD3 + and CD68+ cells in LL and SL
% mean difference for different samples
Scire et al
200725
Minimal number of biopsies required to limit sampling error in small jointsRA patients
  • Assessment cohort (n=9)

  • Validation cohort (n=9)

Synovial biopsies (n=18)
  • Assessment cohort: surgical biopsies (n=9)

  • Validation cohort: US-NB (n=9)

Quantitative analysis of CD20+, CD3 + and CD68+ cells in LL and SL
% mean difference for different samples or cutting levels
RQ5
Baeten et al
200026
Comparing in early vs established RA:
  • Cell infiltrate

30 RA patients
  • Early RA <1 year: (n=16)

  • Established RA >1 year (n=14)

Arthroscopic biopsies (n=30)H&E maximal LL thickness, mean LL thickness, vascularity, cell infiltrate
Semiquantitative Integrines alphaVBeta3 and 5
Tak et al
199727
Comparing in early vs established RA:
  • Cell infiltrate

67 RA patients
  • Early RA <1 year (n=31)

  • Established RA >5 years (n=36)

Blind NB (n=67)H&E LL thickness, vascularity, cell infiltrate
immunohistochemistry (IHC):
  • Semiquantitative analysis of CD68+ (LL and SL), CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD22+, CD38 +cells, mast cells

  • Semiquantitative analysis of TNFα, IL-1β and IL-6 +cells

Katrib et al
200140
Comparing in early vs established RA:
  • Cytokines expression

  • MMPs expression

44 RA patients
  • Early RA <1 year (n=22)

  • Established RA >5 years (n=22)

Blind NB (n=44)Quantitative CD68 +cells
IHC: quantitative analysis of MCP-1, MIP-1alpha, MMP-1, MMP-3, TIMP-1, TIMP-2 by IHC
Ospelt et al
200829REF34
Comparing in early vs established RA:
  • TLR expression

21 RA patients
  • Early RA <1 year (n=10)

  • Established RA >8 years (n=11)

Synovial biopsies n=44
  • Early RA: blind NB (n=10)

  • Established RA: surgical biopsies (n=11)

IGC: semiquantitative expression of TLR2, 3 and 4
Dubikov and Kalinichenko
201030
Comparing in
early vs established RA:
  • Apoptosis

78 RA patients
  • Early RA <3 years (n=35)

  • Established RA >3 years (n=43)

Arthroscopic and surgical biopsies (n=78)Apoptosis (LL and SL)
Quantitative DNA fragmentation staining positive cells p53 +cells and Bcl2 +cells
Tak et al
199928
Comparing in
early vs established RA:
  • p53 expression

27 RA patients
  • Early RA <6 months (n=13)

  • Established RA >5 years (n=14)

Blind NB (n=27)Semiquantitative evaluation of % of p53 +cells
Western blot p53
Alivernini et al
201731
Comparing in early vs remission and LDA in RA:
  • Cell infiltrate

85 RA patients
  • Remission (n=25)

  • Low disease activity (n=10)

  • Active Naïve (n=50)

US-NB (n=85)Semiquantitative
CD68+, CD3+, CD20 + and CD21+ cell infiltrate
Rivellese et al
202033
Comparing in early naïve RA and established TNF inhibitors resistant RA:
  • CD20 +infiltrate

329 RA patients
  • Early RA; naïve (n=165)

  • Established RA; TNF-inhibitors resistant (n=164)

Synovial biopsies (n=329)
  • US-NB (n=325)

  • Arthroscopic biopsies (n=14)

Semiquantitative scoring method (scale of 0–4) and digital image analysis (CD20 +area fraction) histologic B-cell scores
Alivernini et al
202132
Comparing in early vs remission and low disease activity vs established RA:
  • Krenn Synovitis Score

545 RA patients
  • Early RA (n=240)

  • Established RA (n=213)

  • Remission RA (n=92)

US-NB (n=545)Krenn Synovitis Score (lining layer thickness, stromal activation and cell infiltrate)
Ostojic et al
201734
Comparing in early vs advanced stage osteoarthritis (OA):
  • Grade of synovitis

  • Expression of NF-kB and iNOS

20 OA patients
  • Early radiographical OA (K-L 1–2) (n=10)

  • Advanced radiographical OA (K-L 3–4) (n=10)

Synovial biopsies (n=20)
  • Early radiographical: arthroscopic biopsies (n=10)

  • Advanced radiographical: surgical biopsies (n=10)

Krenn Synovitis Score (lining layer thickness, stromal activation and cell infiltrate)
Quantitative iNOS and NF-kB +cells per mm2
Guo et al
201836
Examine PD-1 pathway at various stages of RA development152 RA patients
  • Early RA <1 year (n=57)

  • Established RA >1 year (n=95)

Synovial biopsies (n=152)
  • Early RA: US-NB (n=57)

  • Established RA: arthroscopic biopsies (n=95)

PDCD1, CD274 and PDCD1LG2 expression
PD-1-PD-L1 pathway activity
Guo et al
201736
Examine CD-40-CD40-L pathway in various stages of RA progression152 RA patients
Early RA <1 year (n=57)
Established RA >1 year (n=95)
Synovial biopsies (n=152)
Early RA: US-NB (n=57)
Established RA: arthroscopic biopsies (n=95)
CD40LG and CD40 expression
CD40–CD40L pathway activity
Lequerré et al
200938
Comparing in early vs established RA:
  • Gene expression profile

8 RA patients
  • Early RA <9 months (n=4)

  • Established RA >4 years (n=4)

Arthroscopic biopsies (n=15)Inflammatory pathways gene clusters and molecular signatures
Alivernini et al
202037
Compare in
early vs established RA vs remission:
  • Gene expression profile

112 RA patients
  • Early naïve (n=45)

  • Established resistant (n=31)

  • Remission (n=36)

US-NB (n=112)ST macrophage clusters tracked in ST using single-cell RNAseq across disease activity and stage
  • Bcl2, B-cell lymphoma 2; CD, cluster of differentiation; CPJ, cartilage-pannus junction; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor; IHC, immunohistochemistry; IL, interleukine; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; IP, infra-patellar responses; JIA, juvenile idiopathic arthritis; LL, lining layer; MCP, metacarpophalangeal joint; MMP, matrix metallo-proteinases; NB, needle biopsy; OA, osteoarthritis; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell; P&F, portal and forceps; PsA, psoriatic arthritis; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; RIN, RNA integrity number; RQ, research question; SB, synovial biopsy; SL, sublining; SP, supra-patellar recess; SpA, spondyloarthritis; ST, synovial tissue; TCR, T-cell repertoire; TNF, tumour necrosis factor; UA, undifferenciated arthritis; US, ultrasound; VAS, visual analogic scale.