Table 2

Diagnostic accuracy of the new 2022 ACR/EULAR GCA and the 1990 ACR/EULAR classification criteria, with clinical diagnosis serving as the external criteria in all patients with GCA, as well as those with isolated cranial GCA, isolated LV-GCA, all LV-GCA and biopsy-proven GCA

Sens (%)Spec (%)LR+LR−AUC (95% CI)
All GCA (n=188) vs controls (n=131)2022 ACR/EULAR criteria92.671.83.280.10.928 (0.899 to 0.957)
1990 ACR criteria53.280.22.680.580.719 (0.663 to 0.775)
Isolated cranial GCA (n=83) vs controls (n=131)2022 ACR/EULAR criteria96.471.83.410.050.962 (0.930 to 0.993)
1990 ACR criteria61.480.23.10.480.764 (0.699 to 0.829)
Isolated LV-GCA (n=37) vs controls (n=131)2022 ACR/EULAR criteria62.271.82.210.530.691 (0.592 to 0.790)
1990 ACR criteria18.980.20.951.010.554 (0.455 to 0.653)
LV-GCA (with or without cranial GCA) (n=105) vs controls (n=131)2022 ACR/EULAR criteria89.571.83.170.150.901 (0.859 to 0.942)
1990 ACR criteria46.780.22.360.660.683 (0.616 to 0.751)
Biopsy-proven GCA (n=21) vs controls (n=131)2022 ACR/EULAR criteria10071.83.5500.989 (0.976 to 1)
1990 ACR criteria95.280.24.810.060.931 (0.877 to 0.985)
Biopsy-negative GCA (n=29) vs controls (n=131)2022 ACR/EULAR criteria10071.83.5500.970 (0.946 to 0.995)
1990 ACR criteria55.280.22.790.310.735 (0.642 to 0.829)
  • ACR, American College of Rheumatology; AUC, area under the curve; GCA, giant cell arteritis; LR+, positive likelihood ratio; LR−, negative likelihood ratio; LV, large vessel; Sens, sensitivity; Spec, specificity.