Table 3

Meta-analyses of remission induction treatment with mycophenolate versus cyclophosphamide in GPA and MPA

Study IDInterventionControlOutcomeIncluded studiesNo. of participantsSummary estimateEffects sizeHeterogeneity
Remission
 Berti et al29MMFCYCRemission induction4 RCT300OR (95% CI)1.06 (0.74 to 1.52)I2=0%
 Kuzuya et al55MMFCYCRemission at 6 months4 RCT300RR (95% CI)1.09 (0.86 to 1.38)I2=60%
 Song and Lee86MMFCYCRemission4 RCT300RR (95% CI)1.311 (0.570 to 3.017)I2=57.4%
 Xiong et al99MMFCYCRemission4 RCT290OR (95% CI)1.30 (0.56 to 3.04)I2=57%
Relapse
 Kuzuya et al55MMFCYCRelapse2 RCT189RR (95% CI)1.36 (0.80 to 2.31)I2=45%
 Song and Lee86MMFCYCRelapse2 RCT224RR (95% CI)1.331 (0.497 to 3.568)I2=63.4%
Leucopenia
 Kuzuya et al55MMFCYCLeucopenia3 RCT160RR (95% CI)0.45 (0.16 to 1.32)I2=0%
 Xiong et al99MMFCYCLeucopenia3 RCT150OR (95% CI)0.38 (0.12 to 1.21)I2=0%
Infection
 Kuzuya et al55MMFCYCInfection4 RCT300RR (95% CI)1.26 (0.79 to 2.01)I2=0%
 Song and Lee86MMFCYCInfection4 RCT300RR (95% CI)0.958 (0.561 to 1.634)I2=28.5%
 Xiong et al99MMFCYCInfection4 RCT290OR (95% CI)0.82 (0.35 to 1.91)I2=49%
Other outcomes
 Kuzuya et al55MMFCYCDeath4 RCT300RR (95% CI)1.05 (0.40 to 2.74)I2=0%
 Kuzuya et al55MMFCYCSevere infection or death4 RCT300RR (95% CI)0.87 (0.31 to 2.50)I2=0%
 Kuzuya et al55MMFCYCESKD2 RCT181RR (95% CI)0.66 (0.15 to 2.79)I2=0%
 Kuzuya et al55MMFCYCMalignancy2 RCT224RR (95% CI)1.04 (0.27 to 3.98)I2=0%
 Song and Lee86MMFCYCSAE4 RCT300RR (95% CI)1.232 (0.754 to 2.014)I2=0%
  • I2 refers to the proportion of overall variability that rises from between-study heterogeneity. Bayesian network meta-analysis of RCTs comparing CYC, RTX and MMF induction reported in online supplemental file 2.57

  • CYC, cyclophosphamide; ESKD, end-stage kidney disease; GPA, granulomatosis with polyangiitis; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; MPA, microscopic polyangiitis; RCT, randomised controlled trial; RR, risk ratio; SAE, serious adverse event.