Table 3

Table displaying (1) the accumulated number of visits during the follow-up period where patients were in inflammatory remission, stratified by treatment targets, (2) the total number of new DMARD starts during these visits, (3) the average rate of new DMARD starts per visits and (4) the rate ratio comparing visits with patients in inflammatory remission who failed to reach, versus reached, the treatment targets

Visits with patients in inflammatory remission, stratified by treatment targets:Total no of visits during follow-up period, 3–24 monthsTotal no of DMARD starts during follow-up,
3–24 months
Rate of DMARD starts per visit, mean (SD)RR
(95% CI)
DAS28 non-remission versus
DAS28 remission
2046 vs 8121405 vs 13070.22 (0.45) vs 0.16 (0.40)1.36 (1.22 to 1.51)
DAS28 non-LDA versus
DAS28 LDA
815 vs 9352218 vs 15390.27 (0.48) vs 0.17 (0.41)1.56 (1.35 to 1.80)
SDAI non-remission versus
SDAI remission
4676 vs 4861977 vs 6600.21 (0.45) vs 0.14 (0.37)1.48 (1.34 to 1.64)
SDAI non-LDA versus
SDAI LDA
732 vs 8805221 vs 14160.30 (0.50) vs 0.16 (0.40)1.72 (1.49 to 1.98)
Boolean non-remission versus
Boolean remission
6104 vs 40631211 vs 5460.20 (0.43) vs 0.13 (0.38)1.41 (1.28 to 1.56)
  • The RRs are analysed by Poisson regression, adjusted for age, sex and year of inclusion in SRQ (2011–2015 vs 2016–2020).

  • DAS28, Disease Activity Score 28; DMARD, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; LDA, low disease activity; RR, rate ratio; SDAI, Simplified Disease Activity Index; SRQ, Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register.