Summary
Current methods of clinical assessment in osteoarthritis show a high degree of variability. By contrast, patients with rheumatoid arthritis may be evaluated using a number of standardised and validated indices. One hundred patients with primary osteoarthritis of the hip and knee were interviewed in order to determine the dimensionality of their discomfort and disability and to define the clinical importance of each component item. The symptomatology of osteoarthritis was captured by five pain, one stiffness, twentytwo physical, eight social and eleven emotional items. In spite of a high degree of variability in the frequency of involvement of the individual items, their clinical importance was similar both within as well as across dimensions. Further studies are indicated to determine the reliability, validity and responsiveness of each of the items identified as a prelude to developing a standardized method of assessing patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and knee.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baum, J. A review of the psychological aspects of rheumatic disease. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1982, 11, 352–361.
Cumey, H.L.F. Osteoarthritis of the hip joint and sexual activity. Ann Rheum Dis. 1970, 29, 488–493.
Lunghi, M.E., Miller, P.M., McQuillan, W.M. Psychological factors in osteoarthrosis of the hip. J Psychosom Res, 1978, 22, 55–63.
Bellamy, N., Buchanan, W.W. Outcome measurement in osteoarthritis clinical trials: The case for standardisation. Clin Rheumatol, 1984, 3, 293–303.
Convery, F.R., Minteer, M.A., Amiel, D., Connett, K.L. Polyarticular disability: A functional assessment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1977, 58, 494–499.
Deniston, O.L., Jette, A. A functional status assessment instrument: Validation in an elderly population. Health Serv Res. 1980, 15, 21–34.
Doyle, D.V., Dieppe, P.A., Scott, J., Huskisson, E.C. An articular index for the assessment of osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1981, 40, 75–78.
Eberl, D.R., Fasching, V., Rahlafs, V., Schleyer, I., Wolfe, R. Repeatability and objectivity of various measurements in rheumatioid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1976, 19, 1278–1286.
Empire Rheumatism Council. Multicentre controlled trial comparing cortisone acetate and acetyl salicylic acid in the long-term treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1955, 14, 353–370.
Fries, J.F., Spitz, P., Kraines, R.G., Homan, H.R. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1980, 23, 137–145.
Jette, A.M. Functional capacity evaluation: An empirical approach. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1980, 61, 85–89.
Jette, A.M. Functional status index: Reliability of a chronic disease evaluative instrument. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1980, 62, 395–401.
Jette, A.M., Deniston, O.L. Interobserver reliability of a functional status instrument. J Chronic Dis. 1978, 31, 573–580.
Katz, S., Akpom, C.A. A measure of primary sociobiological functions. Int J Health Serv. 1976, 6, 493–507.
Katz, S., Downs, T.D., Cash, H.R., Grotz, R.C. Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist. 1970, 1, 20–30.
Katz, S., Ford, A.B., Moskiwitz, R.W., Jackson, B.A., Jaff, M.W. Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: A standardised measure of biological and psychosomal function. JAMA. 1963, 914–919.
Keitel, W., Hoffman, H., Weber, G. Ermittlung der prozentualen Funktionsminderung der Gelenke durch einen Bewengungsfunkionstest in der Rheumatologie. Dtsch Gesundheitsw. 1971, 26, 1901–1903.
Lansbury, J. A method for summation of the systemic indices of rheumatoid activity. Am J Med Sci. 1956, 232, 300.
Lansbury, J. Report of a three-year study on the systemic and articular indexes in rheumatoid arthritis — Theoretical and clinical considerations. Arthritis Rheum. 1958, 1, 505–522.
Lansbury, J., Baier, H.N., McCracken, S. Statistical study of variation in systemic and articular indices. Arthritis Rheum. 1962, 5, 445–456.
Lansbury, J., Mueller, E.E. A numerical method for summing up total deformity, Am J Med Sci. 1958, 235, 154.
Lee, P., Jasani, M.K. Dick, W.C., Buchanan, W.W. Evaluation of a functional index in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol. 1973, 2, 71–77.
Lee, P., Webb, J., Anderson, J., Buchanan, W.W. Method of assessing therapeutic potential of antiinflammatory anti-rheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis. Br Med J 1973, 2, 685–688.
Lequesne, M. European guidelines for clinical trials of new antirheumatic drugs. Eular Bulletin. 1980, 9 (Suppl 6), 171–175.
Meenan, R.F., Gertman, P.M., Mason, J.H. Measuring health status in arthritics. The arthritis impact measurement scales. Arthritis Rheum. 1980, 23, 146–152.
Ritchie, D.M., Boyle, J.A., McInnes, J.M., Jasani, M.K., Dalakos, T.G., Grieveson, P., Buchanan, W.W. Clinical studies with and articular index for the assessment of joint tenderness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. 1968, Q J Med. 147, 393–406.
Smythe, H.A., Helewa, A., Goldsmith, C.H. Independent assessor and pooled index as techniques for measuring treatment effects in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol, 1977, 4, 144–152.
Steinbrocker, O., Traeger, C.H., Batterman, R.C. Therapeutic criteria in rheumatoid arthritis. JAMA, 1949, 140, 659–662.
Taylor D. A table for the degree of involvement in chronic arthritis. Can Med Assoc J. 1977, 36, 608–610.
The Co-operating Clinics Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. A seven-day variability study of 449 patients with peripheral rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1965, 8, 302–335.
Tugwell, P.X., Bombardier, C., Chambers, L.W. MACTAR Functional assessment questionnaire. Monograph — McMaster University — Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, 1981.
Chambers, L.W. McMaster Health Index Questionnaire (MHIQ). Monograph — McMaster University — Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics. 1980.
Moskowitz, R.W. Clinical and laboratory findings in osteoarthritis. In: Arthritis and Allied Conditions. Ed. McCarty, D.J. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1979, 1161–1180.
Melzack, R. Concepts of pain measurement. In: Pain Measurement and Assessment. Ed. Melzack, R. New York, Raven Press, 1985, 1–5.
International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Geneva, World Health Organization. 1980, 7–174.
Kremer, E.F., Block, A., Atkinson, J.H. Assessment of pain behaviour, factors that distort self-report. In: Pain Measurement and Assessment. Ed. Melzack, R. New York, Raven Press, 1985, 165–171.
Davis, G.C., Buchsbaum, M.S., Burney, W.E. Naloxone decreases diurnal variations in pain sensitivity and somatosensory-evoked potentials. Life Sci. 1978, 23, 1449–1459.
Simpson, H.W., Bellamy, N., Bohlen, J., Halberg, F. Double-blind field trial of a potential chronobiotic (Quiadon). Int J Chronobiol. 1973, 1, 287–311.
Bellamy, N. Between-subject variability in response to antirheumatic drugs: Implications for clinical trials. Agents Actions. 1985, (In Press).
Melzack, R. The McGill pain questionnaire. In: Pain Measurement and Assessment. Ed. Melzack, R. New York, Raven Press, 1985, 41–48.
Brook, R.H., Ware, J.E., Davies-Avery, A., Stewart, A.L., Donald, C.A., Rogers, W.K., Williams, K.N., Johnston, S.A. Overview of adult health status measures fielded in Rand's health insurance study. Med Care, 1979, 17 (Suppl 7), 1–131.
Deyo, R.A. Measuring functional outcomes in therapeutic trials for chronic disease. Controlled Clinical Trials. 1984, 5, 223–240.
Bellamy, N. The clinical evaluation of osteoarthritis in the elderly. In: Clinics in Rheumatic Diseases. Ed. Kean, W.F. Eastbourne, W.B. Saunders. 1986, (In Press).
Carmines, E.G., Zeller, R.A. Reliability and validity assessment. Beverley Hills, Sages Publications, 1979, 5–71.
Forman, M.D., Malamet, R., Kaplan, E. A survey of osteoarthritis of the knee in the elderly. J Rheumatol. 1983, 10, 282–287.
Bellamy, N. Osteoarthritis — An evaluative index for clinical trials. M.Sc. Thesis, Hamilton, Canada, McMaster University. 100–104.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bellamy, N., Buchanan, W.W. A preliminary evaluation of the dimensionality and clinical importance of pain and disability in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Clin Rheumatol 5, 231–241 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02032362
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02032362