Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of occupationally-oriented rehabilitation on farmers' work techniques, musculoskeletal symptoms, and work ability

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Changes in work techniques, musculoskeletal symptoms and work ability were studied after occupationally-oriented rehabilitation courses for farmers experiencing low back or shoulder pain. Fifty-two women and 43 men participated. The OWAS analysis of work postures, biomechanical modeling of lifting techniques, and a questionnaire were used before and after the courses and after 1 year of follow-up. Bent and twisted postures or postures with the arms over the shoulders occurred more seldom after the courses and the follow-up. Changes in lifting techniques were minor. The musculoskeletal pain index decreased by 12 and 3 points for the women and men, respectively. The mean work ability index increased from 33.5 (men and women) to 36.5 (women) and 35.1 (men). This study showed that rehabilitation can produce significant, long-lasting effects on rehabilitees' work techniques, work ability, and subjective well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nemeth G, Arborelius UP, Svensson OK, Nisell R. The load on the low back and hips and muscular activity during machine milking.Int J Ind Ergon 1990; 5: 115–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Penttinen J.Back pain and sciatica in Finnish farmers. Helsinki: Social Insurance Institution, 1987 (Publications of the Social Insurance Institution ML:71).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nevala-Puranen N, Taattola K, Venäläinen JM. Rail system decreases physical strain in milking.Int J Ind Ergon 1993; 12: 311–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Morrissey SJ. Influences of task posture on physiological task responses.Int J Ind Ergon 1987; 1: 209–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mital A. Effect of body posture and common hand tools on peak torque exertion capabilities.Appl Ergon 1986; 17: 87–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leskinen T.Evaluation of the load on the spine based on a dynamic biomechanical model, electromyographic activity of back muscles, and changes in stature. Tampere: Tampere University of Technology, 1993 (publications 112).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chaffin DB, Andersson G.Occupational biomechanics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ayoub MM, Mital A.Manual materials handling. London: Taylor & Francis, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kilbom Å, Persson J, Jonsson B. Disorders of the cervicobrachial region among female workers in the electronics industry.Int J Ind Ergon 1986; 1: 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Burdorf A. Exposure assessment of risk factors for disorders of the back in occupational epidemiology.Scand J Work Environ Health 1992; 18: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Winkel J, Westgaard R. Occupational and individual risk factors for shoulder-neck complaints: Part II—The scientific basis (literature review) for the guide.Int J Ind Ergon 1992; 10: 85–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Versloot JM, Rozeman A, van Son AM, van Akkerveeken PF. The cost-effectiveness of a back school program in industry: A longitudinal controlled field study.Spine 1992; 17: 22–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Väyrynen S, Könönen U. Short- and long-term effects of a training program on work postures in rehabilitees: A pilot study of loggers suffering from back troubles.Int J Ind Ergon 1991; 7: 103–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Härkäpää K, Järvikoski A, Mellin G, Hurri H. A controlled study on the outcome of inpatient and outpatient treatment of low back pain: Part I. Pain, disability, compliance, and reported treatment benefits three months after treatment.Scand J Rehab Med 1989; 21: 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Härkäpää K, Mellin G, Järvikoski A, Hurri H. A controlled study on the outcome of inpatient and outpatient treatment of low back pain: Part III. Long-term follow-up of pain, disability, and compliance.Scand J Rehab Med 1990; 22: 181–188.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Leino P, Kivekäs J, Hänninen K. Effects of work-oriented fitness courses in lumberjacks with low back pain.J Occup Rehab 1994; 4: 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hopsu L, Louhevaara V. The influence of educational training and ergonomic job redesign intervention on the cleaners' work: A follow-up study. In: Queinnec Y, Daniellou F, eds.Design for everyone: Proceedings of the 11th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association. Paris: International Ergonomics Association, 1991, pp. 534–536.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Videman T, Rauhala H, Asp S, Lindström K, Cedercreutz G, Kämppi M, Tola S, Troup JDG. Patient-handling skill, back injuries, and back pain: An intervention study in nursing.Spine 1989; 14: 148–156.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Millar WJ, Stephens T. The prevalence of overweight and obesity in Britain, Canada, and United States.Am J Public Health 1987; 77: 38–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Louhevaara V, Suurnäkki T.OWAS: A method for the evaluation of postural load during work. Helsinki: Institute of Occupational Health and Centre for Occupational Safety, 1992 (Training publication 11).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mattila M, Karwowski W, Vilkki M. Analysis of working postures in hammering tasks on building construction sites using the computerized OWAS method.Appl Ergon 1993; 24: 405–412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kuorinka I, Jonsson B, Kilbom Å, Vinterberg H, Biering-Sörensen F, Andersson G, Jörgensen K. Standardized Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms.Appl Ergon 1987; 18: 233–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Eskelinen L, Järvinen E, Toikkanen J, Klockars, M. Prevalence and incidence rates of diseases and work ability in different work categories of municipal occupations.Scand J Work, Environ Health 1991; 17: 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lusa S, Louhevaara V, Smolander J, Kinnunen K, Korhonen O, Soukainen J. Biomechanical evaluation of heavy tool-handling in two age groups of firemen.Ergonomics 1991; 34: 1429–1432.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pinzke S. A computerized system for analyzing working postures in agriculture.Int J Ind Ergon 1994; 13: 307–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Carr E. Observational methods in rehabilitation research.Clin Rehab 1991; 5: 89–94.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Singer R.Motor learning and human performance. New York: MacMillan, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Waters TR, Putz-Anderson V, Garg A, Lawrence JF. Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks.Ergonomics 1993; 36: 749–776.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nevala-Puranen, N. Effects of occupationally-oriented rehabilitation on farmers' work techniques, musculoskeletal symptoms, and work ability. J Occup Rehab 6, 191–200 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02110755

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02110755

Key words

Navigation