Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of foot position on Power Doppler Ultrasound grading of Achilles enthesitis

  • Imaging
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether foot position could modify power Doppler grading in evaluation of the Achilles enthesis. Eighteen patients with clinical Achilles enthesitis were studied with power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS) in five different positions of the foot: active and passive dorsiflexion, neutral position, active and passive plantar flexion. The Doppler signal was graded in any position and compared with the others. The Doppler signal was higher with the foot in plantar flexion and decreased gradually, sometimes till to disappear, while increasing dorsiflexion. The Doppler signal was always less during the active keeping of the position of the joint, than during the passive. The PDUS examination of the Achilles enthesis should be performed also with the foot in passive plantar flexion, in order not to underestimate the degree of vascularization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Wiell C, Szkudlarek M, Hasselquist M, Møller JM, Nørregaard J, Terslev L, Ostergaard M (2013) Power Doppler ultrasonography of painful Achilles tendons and enthesis in patients with and without spondyloarthropathy—a comparison with clinical examination and contrast-enhanced MRI. Clin Rheumatol 32:301–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. D’agostino MA, Aegerter P, Jousse-Joulin S, Chary-Valckenaere I, Lecoq B, Gaudin P, Brault I, Schmitz J, Dehaut FX, Le Parc JM, Breban M, Landais P (2009) How to evaluate and improve the reliability of power Doppler ultrasonography for assessing enthesitis in spondylarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 61:61–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Koenig MJ, Torp-Pedersen ST, Christensen R, Boesen MI, Terslev L, Hartkopp A, Bliddal H (2007) Effect of knee position on ultrasound Doppler findings in patients with patellar tendon hyperaemia (jumper’s knee). Ultraschall Med 28:479–483

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee V, Zayat A, Wakefield RJ (2009) The effect of joint position on Doppler flow in finger synovitis. Ann Rheum Dis 68:603–604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gutierrez M, Filippucci E, Grassi W, Rosemffet M (2010) Intratendinous power Doppler changes related to patient position in seronegative spondyloarthritis. J Rheumatol 37:1057–1059

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Iagnocco A, Epis O, Delle Sedie A, Meenagh G, Filippucci E, Riente L, Scirè CA, Montecucco C, Bombardieri S, Grassi W, Valesini G (2008) Ultrasound imaging for the rheumatologist. XVII. Role of colour Doppler and power Doppler. Clin Exp Rheumatol 26:759–762

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Terslev L, Naredo E, Iagnocco A, Balint PV, Wakefield RJ, Aegerter P, Aydin SZ, Bachta A, Hammer HB, Bruyn GA, Filippucci E, Gandjbakhch F, Mandl P, Pineda C, Schmidt WA, D’Agostino MA (2014) Defining enthesitis in spondyloarthritis by ultrasound: results of a Delphi process and of a reliability reading exercise. Arthritis Care Res 66:741–877

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Iagnocco A, Epis O, Delle Sedie A, Meenagh G, Filippucci E, Riente L, Scirè CA, Montecucco C, Bombardieri S, Grassi W, Valesini G (2008) Ultrasound imaging for the rheumatologist. XVII. Role of colour Doppler and power Doppler. Clin Exp Rheumatol 26:759–762

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. D’Agostino MA, Said-Nahal R, Hacquard-Bouder C, Brasseur JL, Dougados M, Breban M (2003) Assessment of peripheral enthesitis in the spondylarthropathies by ultrasonography combined with power Doppler: a cross-sectional study. Arthritis Rheum 48:523–533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Filippucci E, Aydin SZ, Karadag O, Salaffi F, Gutierrez M, Direskeneli H, Grassi W (2009) Reliability of high-resolution ultrasonography in the assessment of Achilles tendon enthesopathy in seronegative spondyloarthropathies. Ann Rheum Dis 68:1850–1855

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kiris A, Kaya A, Ozgocmen S, Kocakoc E (2006) Assessment of enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis by power Doppler ultrasonography. Skelet Radiol 35:522–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hatemi G, Fresko I, Tascilar K, Yazici H (2008) Increased enthesopathy among Behcet’s syndrome patients with acne and arthritis: an ultrasonography study. Arthritis Rheum 58:1539–1545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. de Miguel E, Cobo T, Munoz-Fernandez S, Naredo E, Uson J, Acebes JC, Andreu JL, Martin-Mola E (2009) Validity of enthesis ultrasound assessment in spondyloarthropathy. Ann Rheum Dis 68:169–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gandjbakhch F, Terslev L, Joshua F, Wakefield RJ, Naredo E, D’Agostino MA (2011) Ultrasound in the evaluation of enthesitis: status and perspectives. Arthritis Res Ther 13:R188

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Öhberg L, Lorentzon R, Alfredson H (2011) Neovascularisation in Achilles tendons with painful tendinosis but not in normal tendons: an ultrasonographic investigation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:233–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Öhberg L, Alfredson H (2004) Effects on neovascularisation behind the good results with eccentric training in chronic mid-portion Achilles tendinosis? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12:465–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Grassi W, Gutierrez M, Filippucci E (2010) The sound of enthesis. J Rheumatol 37:1986–1987

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Backhaus M, Burmester GR, Gerber T, Grassi W, Machold KP, Swen WA, Wakefield RJ, Manger B (2001) Working group for musculoskeletal ultrasound in the EULAR Standing Committee on International Clinical Studies including therapeutic trials. Guidelines for musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis 60:641–699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Dong Q, Fessell DP (2009) Achilles tendon ultrasound technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:W173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author’s contribution

All authors actively participated in conducting the study, contributed to the critical revisions to the manuscript and approved the article for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanna Cuomo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Marcello Zappia, Giovanna Cuomo, Maria Teresa Martino, Alfonso Reginelli and Luca Brunese declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Additional informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for whom identifying information is included in this article.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zappia, M., Cuomo, G., Martino, M.T. et al. The effect of foot position on Power Doppler Ultrasound grading of Achilles enthesitis. Rheumatol Int 36, 871–874 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-016-3461-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-016-3461-z

Keywords

Navigation