Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anti-CCP and antikeratin antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis, primary Sjögren’s syndrome, and Wegener’s granulomatosis

  • Letter
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the frequency of antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptides (anti-CCP) and keratin (AKA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as well as in patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) and Wegener’s granulomatosis (WG), who may present with rheumatoid factor (RF)-positive arthritis. The study group consisted of 46 patients with RA (26 patients were negative for RF), 32 with pSS, 22 with WG, and 40 healthy controls. The RF, anti-CCP, and AKA were detected in serum using the latex agglutination test, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and indirect immunofluorescence, respectively. The agreement between those tests was evaluated by kappa test. No positive result for AKA was detected in pSS and WG patients, and anti-CCP was found in only one patient with pSS. The results of kappa tests were low, varying between 0.25 (RF-anti-CCP) and 0.02 (RF-AKA). The sensitivity and specificity values were 43 and 44% for RF, 65 and 98% for anti-CCP, and 58 and 100% for AKA, respectively, in RA patients. In the RF-negative RA group, AKA was found to have a high frequency (55%) in comparison to anti-CCP (38%). Seropositivity was found to be 87% for any one of the three autoantibodies tested in RA patients. With a higher specificity, values for RA, anti-CCP, and AKA seem to be helpful for the differential diagnosis of patients with RF-positive arthritis, which may include patients with WG and pSS, and screening of all three antibodies may increase the diagnostic performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aho K, Palosuo T (2002) Can outcome of early synovitis be predicted by serological tests? Clin Rheumatol 21:97–102

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cordonnier C, Meyer O, Palazzo E et al (1996) Diagnostic value of anti-RA33 antibody, antikeratin antibody, antiperinuclear factor and antinuclear antibody in early rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with rheumatoid factor. Br J Rheumatol 35:620–624

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schellekens GA, Visser H, de Jong BA et al (2000) The diagnostic properties of rheumatoid arthritis antibodies, recognizing a cyclic citrullinated peptide. Arthritis Rheum 43:155–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldbach-Mansky R, Lee J, Mc-Coy A et al (2000) Rheumatoid arthritis associated autoantibodies in patients with synovitis of recent onset. Arthritis Res 2:236–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bizzaro N, Mazzanti G, Tonutti E, Villalta D, Tozzoli R (2001) Diagnostic accuracy of the anti-citrulline antibody assay for rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Chem 47:1089–1093

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bas S, Genevay S, Meyer O, Gabay C (2003) Anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies IgM and IgA rheumatoid factors in the diagnosis and prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 42:677–680

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vincent C, Serre G, Lapeyre F et al (1989) High diagnostic value in rheumatoid arthritis of antibodies to the stratum corneum of rat oesophagus epithelium, so-called “antikeratin antibodies”. Ann Rheum Dis 48:712–722

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Saraux A, Berthelot JM, Chales G et al (2002) Value of laboratory tests in early prediction of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 47:155–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zeng X, Ai M, Tian X et al (2003) Diagnostic value of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 30:1451–1455

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maddison PJ (1998) Autoantibody profile. In: Maddison PJ, Isenberg DA, Woo P, Glass DN (eds) Oxford textbook of rheumatology, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 665–676

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harrison BJ, Symmons DPM, Barrett EM, Silman AJ (1998) The performance of the 1987 ARA classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis in a population-based cohort of patients with early inflammatory polyarthritis. J Rheumatol 25:2324–2330

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Castro-Poltronieri A, Alarcon-Segovia D (1983) Articular manifestations of primary Sjogren’s syndrome. J Rheumatol 10:485

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tzioufas AG, Youinou P, Moutsopoulos HM (1998) Sjogren’s syndrome. In: Maddison PJ, Isenberg DA, Woo P, Glass DN (eds) Oxford textbook of rheumatology, vol II, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 1301–1317

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hoffman GS, Kerr GS, Leavitt RY et al (1992) Wegener’s granulomatosis: an analysis of 158 patients. Ann Intern Med 116:488–498

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Noritake DT, Weiner SR, Bassett LW, Paulus HE, Weisbart R (1987) Rheumatic manifestations of Wegener’s granulomatosis. J Rheumatol 14:949–951

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stone JH, Hoffman GS (2003) Wegener’s granulomatosis and lymphomatoid granulomatosis. In: Hochberg MC, Silman AJ, Smolen JS, Weinblatt ME, Weisman MH (eds) Rheumatology, vol II, 3rd edn. Elsevier Science, New York, pp 1635–1648

    Google Scholar 

  17. Douglas G, Bird K, Flume P, Silver R, Bolster M (2003) Wegener’s granulomatosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 30:2064–2069

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Youinou P, Le Goff P, Colaco CB et al (1985) Antikeratin antibodies in serum and synovial fluid show specificity for rheumatoid arthritis in a study of connective tissue diseases. Ann Rheum Dis 44:450–454

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dubucquoi S, Solau-Gervais E, Lefranc D et al (2004) Evaluation of anti-citrullinated filaggrin antibodies as hallmarks for the diagnosis of rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis 63:415–419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA et al (1998) The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 31:315–324

    Google Scholar 

  21. Young BJJ, Mallya RK, Leslie RDJ, Clark CJM, Hamblin TJ (1979) Anti-keratin antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis. BMJ 2:97–99

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vittecoq O, Incaurgarat B, Jouen-Beades F et al (2004) Autoantibodies recognizing citrullinated rat filaggrin in an ELISA using citrullinated and non-citrullinated recombinant proteins as antigens are highly diagnostic for rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 135:173–180

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mediwake R, Isenberg DA, Schellekens GA, van Venrooij WJ (2001) Use of anti-citrullinated peptide and anti-RA33 antibodies in distinguishing erosive arthritis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 60:67–68

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sevil Kamali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kamali, S., Polat, N.G., Kasapoglu, E. et al. Anti-CCP and antikeratin antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis, primary Sjögren’s syndrome, and Wegener’s granulomatosis. Clin Rheumatol 24, 673–676 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-005-1104-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-005-1104-y

Keywords

Navigation