Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

High rate of disease remission in moderate rheumatoid arthritis on etanercept therapy: data from GISEA, the Italian biologics register

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with moderate or severe disease activity. We analyzed data from the Italian biologics register Gruppo Italiano Studio Early Arthritides (GISEA) to investigate the rate of disease remission and functional improvement, based on the 28-Joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) and the (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score in RA patients with moderate or severe disease activity beginning etanercept therapy. Disease was defined as severe (H-RA) with DAS28 ≥5.1 and moderate (M-RA) with DAS28 ≥3.2 to 5.1 at baseline. Patients were considered in remission if DAS28 was ≤2.6, and HAQ ≤0.5 defined normal function. We enrolled 953 RA patients, 320 with M-RA and 633 H-RA. Age and disease duration were similar in the two cohorts, but H-RA patients had significantly more comorbidities (p < 0.01) and took significantly more disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (p < 0.001) than M-RA patients. After 1 year, the percentage of patients achieving disease remission and normal function (DAS28 ≤2.6 plus HAQ ≤0.5) was higher in M-RA (21.4 %) than in H-RA patients (14.8 %, p = 0.007), regardless of the disease duration. Additionally, female gender (p = 0.006) and H-RA class (p = 0.002) negatively predicted disease remission at 1 year. However, the drug survival rate did not differ between the two subsets. This study confirms that etanercept was effective in the treatment of active RA, but best response, in terms of disease remission and normal function ability, was greater and easier to attain in M-RA patients. These findings may aid clinicians to choose the best strategy to treat RA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Bijlsma JW, Breedveld FC, Boumpas D, Burmester G et al (2010) Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis 69:631–637

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aletaha D, Smolen JS (2006) The definition and measurement of disease modification in inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 32:9–44, vii

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Saraux A, Gossec L, Goupille P, Bregman B, Boccard E, Dupont D, Beresniak A (2010) Cost-effectiveness modelling of biological treatment sequences in moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis in France. Rheumatology (Oxford) 49:733–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Conaghan PG, Hensor EMA, Keenan AM, Morgan AW, Emery P (2010) Persistently moderate DAS-28 is not benign: loss of function occurs in early RA despite step-up DMARD therapy. Rheumatology 49:1894–1899

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Listing J, Strangfeld A, Rau R, Kekow J, Gromnica-Ihle E, Klopsch T et al (2006) Clinical and functional remission: even though biologics are superior to conventional DMARDs overall success rates remain low–results from RABBIT, the German biologics register. Arthritis Res Ther 8:R66

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Keystone E, Freundlich B, Schiff M, Li J, Hooper M (2009) Patients with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA) achieve better disease activity states with etanercept treatment than patients with severe RA. J Rheumatol 36:522–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hyrich KL, Deighton C, Watson KD, BSRBR Control Centre Consortium, Symmons DP, Lunt M, British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (2009) Benefit of anti-TNF therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients with moderate disease activity. Rheumatology (Oxford) 48:1323–1327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS et al (1988) The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 31:315–324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Prevoo ML, van’t Hof MA, Kuper HH, van Leeuwen MA, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL (1995) Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts. Development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 38:44–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. van Gestel AM, Prevoo ML, van Hof MA, van Rijswijk MH, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL (1996) Development and validation of the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. Comparison with the preliminary American College of Rheumatology and the World Health Organization/International League Against Rheumatism Criteria. Arthritis Rheum 39:34–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Valesini G, Montecucco C, Cutolo M (2006) Recommendations for the use of biologic (TNF-alpha blocking) agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in Italy. Clin Exp Rheumatol 24:413–423

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh JA, Furst DE, Bharat A, Curtis JR, Kavanaugh AF, Kremer JM et al (2012) 2012 update of the 2008 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 64:625–639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Smolen JS, Landewé R, Breedveld FC, Dougados M, Emery P, Gaujoux-Viala C et al (2010) EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Ann Rheum Dis 69:964–975

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ledingham J, Deighton C, British Society for Rheumatology Standards, Guidelines and Audit Working Group (2005) Update on the British Society for Rheumatology guidelines for prescribing TNFalpha blockers in adults with rheumatoid arthritis (update of previous guidelines of April 2001). Rheumatology (Oxford) 44:157–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Deighton C, Hyrich K, Ding T, Ledingham J, Lunt M, Luqmani R et al (2010) BSR and BHPR rheumatoid arthritis guidelines on eligibility criteria for the first biological therapy. Rheumatology (Oxford) 49:1197–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kiely P, Walsh D, Williams R, Young A, Network ERA (2011) Outcome in rheumatoid arthritis patients with continued conventional therapy for moderate disease activity—the early RA network (ERAN). Rheumatology (Oxford) 50:926–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Iannone F, Gremese E, Atzeni F, Biasi D, Botsios C, Cipriani P et al (2012) Long-term retention of tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor therapy in a large Italian cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis from the GISEA registry: an appraisal of predictors. J Rheumatol 39:1179–1184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bansback NJ, Brennan A, Ghatnekar O (2005) Cost effectiveness of adalimumab in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis in Sweden. Ann Rheum Dis 64:995–1002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bansback NJ, Ara R, Barkham N, Brennan A, Fraser AD, Conway P et al (2006) Estimating the cost and health status consequences of treatment with TNF antagonists in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 45:1029–1038

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fabris M, Tolusso B, Di Poi E, Assaloni R, Sinigaglia L, Ferraccioli G (2002) Tumor necrosis factor-alpha receptor II polymorphism in patients from southern Europe with mild-moderate and severe rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 29:1847–1850

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Florenzo Iannone has received consulting fees, speaking fees, or honoraria (less than €10,000) from Pfizer, Merck, Abbott, and Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Pfizer Italia Srl gave a financial support to CD Pharma Group Srl to extrapolate the clinical data from the GISEA register. The authors kept their independence in designing the study, interpreting the data, and writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florenzo Iannone.

Additional information

Trial registry no. NCT01543594

List of co-authors

Gruppo Italiano di Studio sulle Early Arthritides (GISEA): Crescenzio Scioscia, Anna Laura Fedele, Gianfranco Ferraccioli, Fabiola Atzeni, Sara Bongiovanni, Leonardo Punzi, Livio Bernardi, Valentina Bagnari, Marcello Govoni, Walter Grassi, Fausto Salaffi, Stefania Manganelli, Elena Frati, Antonio Carletto, Cristian Caimmi, Alice Palloni, Laura Niccoli, Clodoveo Ferri, Ennio Giulio Favalli, Giovanni Triolo, Marcella Di Gangi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iannone, F., Gremese, E., Gallo, G. et al. High rate of disease remission in moderate rheumatoid arthritis on etanercept therapy: data from GISEA, the Italian biologics register. Clin Rheumatol 33, 31–37 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-013-2348-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-013-2348-6

Keywords

Navigation