Skip to main content
Log in

Coronary plaque imaging with 256-slice multidetector computed tomography: interobserver variability of volumetric lesion parameters with semiautomatic plaque analysis software

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential clinical value of coronary plaque imaging with a new generation CT scanner and the interobserver variability of coronary plaque assessment with a new semiautomatic plaque analysis application. Thirty-five isolated plaques of the left anterior descending coronary artery from 35 patients were evaluated with a new semiautomatic plaque analysis application. All patients were scanned with a 256-slice MDCT scanner (Brilliance iCT, Philips Healthcare, Cleveland OH, USA). Two independent observers evaluated lesion volume, maximum plaque burden, lesion CT number mean and standard deviation, and relative lesion composition. We found 10 noncalcified, 16 mixed, and 9 calcified lesions in our study cohort. Relative interobserver bias and variability for lesion volume were −37%, −13%, −49%, −44% and 28%, 16%, 37%, and 90% for all, noncalcified, mixed, and calcified lesions, respectively. Absolute interobserver bias and variability for relative lesion composition were 1.2%, 0.5%, 1.5%, 1.3% and 3.3%, 4.5%, 7.0%, and 4.4% for all, noncalcified, mixed, and calcified lesions, respectively. While mixed and calcified lesions demonstrated a high degree of lesion volume interobserver variability, noncalcified lesions had a lower degree of lesion volume interobserver variability. In addition, relative noncalcified lesion composition had a very low interobserver variability. Therefore, there may a role for MDCT in serial noncalcified plaque assessment with semiautomatic analysis software.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dey D et al (2006) Computer-aided detection and evaluation of lipid-rich plaque on noncontrast cardiac CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(6 Suppl 2):S407–S413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shinohara M et al (2008) Atherosclerotic plaque imaging using phase-contrast X-ray computed tomography. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 294(2):H1094–H1100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brodoefel H et al (2008) Characterization of coronary atherosclerosis by dual-source computed tomography and HU-based color mapping: a pilot study. Eur Radiol 18(11):2466–2474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Petranovic M et al (2009) Assessment of nonstenotic coronary lesions by 64-slice multidetector computed tomography in comparison to intravascular ultrasound: evaluation of nonculprit coronary lesions. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3(1):24–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Achenbach S et al (2004) Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced, submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography: a segment-based comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 109(1):14–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Feuchtner G et al (2008) Is there a relation between non-calcifying coronary plaques and acute coronary syndromes? A retrospective study using multislice computed tomography. Cardiology 110(4):241–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoffmann U et al (2006) Noninvasive assessment of plaque morphology and composition in culprit and stable lesions in acute coronary syndrome and stable lesions in stable angina by multidetector computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 47(8):1655–1662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leschka S et al (2005) Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 26(15):1482–1487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Glodny B et al (2009) A method for calcium quantification by means of CT coronary angiography using 64-multidetector CT: very high correlation with Agatston and volume scores. Eur Radiol 19(7):1661–1668

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Walker MJ et al (2009) New radiation dose saving technologies for 256-slice cardiac computed tomography angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25(Suppl 2):189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Klass O et al (2009) Prospectively gated axial CT coronary angiography: preliminary experiences with a novel low-dose technique. Eur Radiol 19(4):829–836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ecabert O et al (2008) Automatic model-based segmentation of the heart in CT images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 27(9):1189–1201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lorenz C, von Berg J (2006) A comprehensive shape model of the heart. Med Image Anal 10(4):657–670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schoenhagen P, Nissen SE (2004) An atlas and manual of coronary intravascular ultrasound imaging. Panthenon Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork DG (2000) Pattern classification, 2nd edn. Wiley-Intersience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. McCollough C et al (2008) The measurement, reporting, and management of radiation dose in CT. Tech Rep 96 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Available online at: www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/rpt_96.pdf

  17. Shrimpton P (2004) Assessment of patient dose in CT. Tech Rep NRPB-PE/1/2004 National Radiological Protection Board

  18. Leber AW et al (2004) Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 43(7):1241–1247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Budoff MJ et al (2009) Coronary calcium predicts events better with absolute calcium scores than age-sex-race/ethnicity percentiles: MESA (Multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis). J Am Coll Cardiol 53(4):345–352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hartmann M et al (2009) Reproducibility of volumetric intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency-based analysis of coronary plaque composition in vivo. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25(1):13–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hirayama A et al (2009) Qualitative and quantitative changes in coronary plaque associated with atorvastatin therapy. Circ J 73(4):718–725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Grants

This study has been exclusively financed from research funds provided by the state of Baden-Württemberg, Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver Klass.

Additional information

This paper has not yet been submitted for publication elsewhere. The abstract is accepted for presentation in the scientific sessions of the ESCR 2009.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klass, O., Kleinhans, S., Walker, M.J. et al. Coronary plaque imaging with 256-slice multidetector computed tomography: interobserver variability of volumetric lesion parameters with semiautomatic plaque analysis software. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26, 711–720 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-010-9614-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-010-9614-3

Keywords

Navigation