Elsevier

Biologicals

Volume 42, Issue 4, July 2014, Pages 177-183
Biologicals

Review
The challenge of indication extrapolation for infliximab biosimilars

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biologicals.2014.05.005Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Abstract

A biosimilar is intended to be highly similar to a reference biologic such that any differences in quality attributes (i.e., molecular characteristics) do not affect safety or efficacy. Achieving this benchmark for biologics, especially large glycoproteins such as monoclonal antibodies, is challenging given their complex structure and manufacturing. Regulatory guidance on biosimilars issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Health Canada and European Medicines Agency indicates that, in addition to a demonstration of a high degree of similarity in quality attributes, a reduced number of nonclinical and clinical comparative studies can be sufficient for approval. Following a tiered approach, clinical studies are required to address concerns about possible clinically significant differences that remain after laboratory and nonclinical evaluations. Consequently, a critical question arises: can clinical studies that satisfy concerns regarding safety and efficacy in one condition support “indication extrapolation” to other conditions? This question will be addressed by reviewing the case of a biosimilar to infliximab that was approved recently in South Korea, Europe, and Canada for multiple indications through extrapolation. The principles discussed should also apply to biosimilars of other monoclonal antibodies that are approved to treat multiple distinct conditions.

Keywords

Infliximab
Extrapolation
Biosimilars
Subsequent entry biologics
Immunogenicity
Monoclonal antibodies

Cited by (0)