Elsevier

Clinical Therapeutics

Volume 35, Issue 12, December 2013, Pages 2028-2035
Clinical Therapeutics

Is It Possible to Withdraw Biologics From Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.10.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Biologic agents targeting tumor necrosis factor (TNF) have revolutionized the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Clinical remission is perceived as a realistic primary goal, and its maintenance leads to structural and functional remission.

Objective

This study reviews whether discontinuation of biologic agents is possible after sustained remission and discusses its significance from the risk/benefit point of view (including safety and health economic considerations).

Methods

Using a strategic PubMed search, 45 original research articles regarding discontinuation of biologic agents were identified; 7 were selected that had an obvious focus on discontinuation of biologic agents. These articles included the TNF20, BeSt (Behandel Strategieen), and RRR (Remission Induction by Remicade in RA) studies. However, because of the limitations of the original search, we also review here some articles that did not focus mainly on discontinuation of biologic agents but that presented data regarding biologic-free control. These studies included OPTIMA (Optimal Protocol for Treatment Initiation With MTX and Adalimumab), PRESERVE, and CERTAIN, as well as some recent findings in the HONOR (Humira Discontinuation Without Functional and Radiographic Damage Progression Following Sustained Remission) study from our department.

Results

In BeSt and OPTIMA, clinical remission was sustained without functional progression by discontinuing TNF inhibitors, after reducing disease activity by using TNF inhibitors and methotrexate (MTX), in patients with early RA and who were MTX naive. In some studies (including RRR and HONOR), the discontinuation of TNF inhibitors after sustained remission was possible in some patients with long-standing RA who had an inadequate response to MTX. When disease activity flared up after treatment discontinuation, re-treatment with infliximab or adalimumab was highly effective and safe in the majority of patients. It is also clear that tight control with TNF inhibitors and MTX seems to be a prerequisite for having a better chance of biologic-free remission.

Conclusions

Intensive treatment with TNF inhibitors may change the disease process of RA and potentially offers the possibility of a “treatment holiday” from biologic agents.

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by inflammation and joint destruction that causes significant morbidity and mortality. To prevent joint damage, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) such as methotrexate (MTX) should often be started after patients are diagnosed. However, the use of MTX monotherapy often fails to control disease activity and to prevent structural damage, and more effective treatment strategies are thus needed. TNF plays a pivotal role in the pathologic processes of RA through the accumulation of inflammatory cells and the self-perpetuation of inflammation, which leads to joint destruction. The combination of MTX and biologic agents targeting tumor necrosis factor (TNF) has revolutionized the treatment of RA, producing significant improvements in clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes that were not previously observe. The combination has produced the emerging outcome and upcoming end point for the treatment as the followings.1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Clinical remission is perceived as an appropriate and realistic primary goal in many patients, and its maintenance leads to structural and functional remission.

The possibility of discontinuation of biologic agent treatment after achievement of remission or low disease activity must be considered because of the long-term safety issues found by inhibiting a particular cytokine and the economic burden associated with expensive biological products. The decision to discontinue synthetic DMARDs should be made with caution; such discontinuation results in twice as many flare-ups, difficulties in reintroducing remission, and a halt in damage.6 However, similar studies are not available for the biologic agents it remains unclear whether treatment strategies with biologics targeting induction and/or maintenance of clinical remission can potentially lead to subsequent discontinuation of the TNF inhibitors. The goal of the present article was to determine if discontinuation of biologic agents targeting TNF is possible in RA patients, after obtaining low disease activity or clinical remission during certain periods of use with TNF inhibitors. The content is based on results of a systemic literature review as well as new information.

Section snippets

Methods

A search of PubMed was conducted by using a search strategy that combined terms for rheumatoid arthritis, biological agent, and discontinuation, discontinuing, or cessation. The systematic literature search strategy was as follows: #1, arthritis, rheumatoid [MeSH]; #2, biological agents OR biologics OR TNF inhibitor OR infliximab OR etanercet OR golimumab OR abatacept OR tocilizumab OR certolizumab pegol; #3, clinical trial [Filter]; #4, English [Filter]; #5, discontinuation OR discontinuing OR

Can We Discontinue Infliximab?

Infliximab is an anti-TNF chimeric monoclonal antibody that was approved for the treatment of RA in 1999 in the United States and the European Union. The study regarding biologic-free treatment in RA patients was first reported by a British group as a TNF20 study.9, 14 Patients with early RA who had <12 months of symptoms were treated with a combination of infliximab and MTX. Patients who initiated treatment with infliximab and MTX achieved higher American College of Rheumatology 50% and 70%

Conclusions

After the sustained remission by biologic agents targeting TNF in MTX-naive RA patients and RA patients with inadequate response to MTX, discontinuation of biologic agents is emerging from the risk/benefit point of view, including safety and economical issues. After discontinuing TNF inhibitors, patients with RA could successfully remain in low disease activity or remission without radiologic and functional damage progression of articular destruction. Such a discontinuation of TNF inhibitors is

Conflicts of Interest

Dr. Tanaka has received consulting fees, speaking fees, and/or honoraria from Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, Eisai, Chugai Pharma, Abbott Japan, Astellas Pharma, Daiichi-Sankyo, Abbvie, Janssen Pharma, Pfizer, Takeda Pharma, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly Japan, GlaxoSmithKline, Quintiles, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, and Asahi-Kasei Pharma and has received research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, Abbvie, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, Chugai Pharma, Astellas Pharma, and Daiichi-Sankyo.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by Research on Rare and Intractable Diseases and Research Grant-In-Aid for Scientific Research by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, and the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan and UOEH Grant for Advanced Research.

The authors thank all medical staff in all institutions for providing the study data.

References (27)

  • N.B. Klarenbeek et al.

    Discontinuing treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in sustained clinical remission: exploratory analyses from the BeSt study

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2011)
  • V. Bejarano et al.

    Benefits 8 years after a remission induction regimen with an infliximab and methotrexate combination in early rheumatoid arthritis

    Rheumatology (Oxford)

    (2010)
  • Y. Tanaka et al.

    Discontinuation of infliximab after attaining low disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, RRR (Remission Induction by Remicade in RA) study

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2010)
  • Cited by (21)

    • Persistence of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: An analysis of the South Korean National Health Insurance Database

      2018, Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
      Citation Excerpt :

      We could not be sure that discontinuation of the current biologic DMARDs, including switching, restarting, and stopping is only attributable to lack of efficacy or adverse event because the reason of discontinuation was not identified in the claims data. Biologic DMARDs might be discontinued because low disease activity or remission has been achieved, which seems to contradict the interpretation of persistence in terms of effectiveness [25,26]. A further limitation of this study is that the Korean National Health Insurance database provides administrative claims data, which do not contain clinical information as disease activity, and reasons of discontinuation of prior treatment at the time of receiving the index biologic DMARDs.

    • Combination screening of synthetic drugs and plant derived natural products-Potential and challenges for drug development

      2014, Synergy
      Citation Excerpt :

      In RA the combination of methotrexate (MTX) with a TNF-α-antagonist was shown to be more effective compared to the single applications [9,14]. Through combinations of Biologicals with MTX for the first time “drug free remissions periods” in RA patients have been achieved, the so called “drug holidays” [15,16]. The great potential of combination therapies can also be assessed from the results obtained by a multimodal treatment – the Bonn-Malmö-Protocol – for another autoimmune disease, the acquired hemophilia (AH).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text