Elsevier

Joint Bone Spine

Volume 77, Issue 4, July 2010, Pages 297-305
Joint Bone Spine

Review
Biomarkers for prediction of TNFα blockers response in rheumatoid arthritis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2010.02.026Get rights and content

Abstract

Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that plays pivotal roles in regulating the inflammatory response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Intensive studies on TNFα-driven inflammation processes have led to the development of TNFα blockers for RA treatment. However, response to these therapies is heterogeneous with roughly two-thirds of patient response and one-third non-response. Given the destructive nature of RA, the risk of adverse effects, and considerable costs for TNFα blocker therapy, there is a strong need to identify predictors of response prior to start the TNFα blocker therapy. Here we review several studies focused on predicting the response to TNFα blockers. Demographic, clinical, radiological, blood, genetic or synovial tissue biomarkers were studied to find some predictive biomarkers of TNFα blocker response. Unfortunately, results from these studies are heterogeneous. Discrepancy between these studies can be explained in part to the heterogeneity between the studies. As difference in the response criteria used, the delay of efficacy for the primary endpoint, and the genetic background of each population were all observed. Nevertheless, a high local and systemic level of TNFα prior to TNFα blocker therapy seems to be associated with a good clinical response. However, to validate these results, additional studies using independent and large cohorts are needed.

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease, which predominantly involves synovial tissues and affects roughly 0.5% of the French population. The last 10 years have led us to recognize tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) as one of the key cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of RA. Such results have provided the basis for the development of TNFα blockers for treating RA when methotrexate fails. Currently, three TNFα blockers are available in clinical practice: infliximab (a chimeric monoclonal antibody), adalimumab (a human monoclonal antibody), and etanercept (a fusion protein consisting of a dimer of the extracellular portion of p75 TNFα receptor linked to the Fc portion of human IgG1). Etanercept is also able to bind to lymphotoxin α (LTA). Roughly all TNFα blockers are efficient in two-thirds of patients, but this means that one-third of patients fail to respond to TNFα blocker therapy. In addition to the clinical effect, it was observed that TNFα blockers prevent joint [1] and bone destruction [2]. Despite their efficiency, the use of TNFα blockers exposes patients to some risks (infectious, neoplastic, allergic, etc.) that seem disproportional, especially if the patient might not respond to the therapy. Therefore, identifying biomarkers that predict responses to TNFα blockers are crucial for optimizing patient selection and increasing the balance between benefit and risk. This personalized form of medicine will also become increasingly advantageous as the number of available drugs grows. In addition, this prediction is also an economic issue at this time where costs need to be reduced.

As the prediction of response to TNFα blockers is a key issue, extensive biomarker analysis was performed using several complex methods to identify one or more biomarkers, which should be then easy to assess in the daily practice. Here we will review these studies performed to predict the response to TNFα blockers in RA. We will order this review according the following markers: demographic, clinical and radiological parameters; blood biomarkers; genetic markers and synovial markers.

Section snippets

Demographic, clinical and radiological predictive factors

Disease duration, age of onset, baseline DAS28, presence of rheumatoid nodules, and the baseline number of radiographic erosions failed to correlate with TNFα blocker response in RA [3], [4]. Only high disease activity, functional ability or smoking status were found to predict TNFα blocker response [5], [6]. However, results for functional ability are contradictory [5], [6]. Despite some controversial results, these results would suggest that severe arthritis is less susceptible to TNFα

Usual biologic parameters

Most of the usual laboratory parameters investigated failed to predict clinical response. The available set of biological parameters commonly used for RA diagnosis or prognosis (such as baseline C-reactive protein [CRP], rheumatoid factor [RF] and anticyclic citrullinated peptide [anti-CCP]) were assessed with heterogeneous results. For some studies, these biomarkers failed to predict a response to TNFα blockers [3], [4], [5], [7], [8]. Few studies found that, the presence of RF, high level of

HLA-DRB1 and the shared epitope

HLA-DRB1 is localized on this area and some HLA-DRB1 alleles encode a common structural element designated as the shared epitope (SE), which is strongly associated with susceptibility and severity of RA patients [31], [32]. Only one study found an association between two copies of the SE and a good clinical response to etanercept [33], whereas many other studies failed to replicate these results in several RA populations [11], [31], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38] (Table 4). Clearly, the SE is not

Synovial biopsy

The synovial approach is stressed in the perspective that RA is not a systemic disease. The inflammatory mechanisms targeted by TNFα blockers are located in the synovium and gene expression profiles of RA circulating blood may not be representative of these synovial tissue-specific pathways. This approach is usually justified by its ability to discriminate RA from other joint disorders [53], and the power to observe some changes in the number of macrophages under therapy. Synovial samples were

Conclusion

Since RA patients show large heterogeneity in their response to TNFα blockers, prediction of response remains an essential challenge. Since response prediction to TNFα blockers is a multifactorial event, which requires a multiparameter biomarker, the research focus is multidisciplinary, including clinometric, cytometric, metabolic, genomic, and proteomic biomarkers.

However, results from studies on this topic are heterogeneous. This heterogeneity of the results is also related to a variety of

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors has any conflicts of interest to declare.

References (60)

  • P.E. Lipsky et al.

    Infliximab and methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

    N Engl J Med

    (2000)
  • H. Marotte et al.

    A 1-year case-control study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis indicates prevention of loss of bone mineral density in both responders and non-responders to infliximab

    Arthritis Res Ther

    (2007)
  • G.J. Wolbink et al.

    Relationship between serum trough infliximab levels, pretreatment C reactive protein levels, and clinical response to infliximab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2005)
  • C. Antoni et al.

    Subgroup analyses show consistent benefit in a 30-week double blind trial (Attract) with an anti-TNFα monoclonal antibody, infliximab, in rheumatoid arthritis patients on methotrexate

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (1999)
  • K.L. Hyrich et al.

    Predictors of response to anti-TNF-alpha therapy among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register

    Rheumatology (Oxford)

    (2006)
  • L.E. Kristensen et al.

    Predictors of response to anti-TNF therapy according to ACR and EULAR criteria in patients with established RA: results from the South Swedish Arthritis Treatment Group Register

    Rheumatology (Oxford)

    (2008)
  • T. Lequerre et al.

    Autoantibodies, metalloproteinases and bone markers in rheumatoid arthritis patients are unable to predict their responses to infliximab

    Rheumatology (Oxford)

    (2007)
  • M.H. Buch et al.

    C-reactive protein as a predictor of infliximab treatment outcome in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: defining subtypes of non-response and subsequent response to etanercept

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2005)
  • F. Bobbio-Pallavicini et al.

    High IgA rheumatoid factor levels are associated with poor clinical response to tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2007)
  • Y. Braun-Moscovici et al.

    Anticyclic citrullinated protein antibodies as a predictor of response to antitumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

    J Rheumatol

    (2006)
  • C. Potter et al.

    Association of rheumatoid factor and anticyclic citrullinated peptide positivity, but not carriage of shared epitope or PTPN22 susceptibility variants, with anti-tumour necrosis factor response in rheumatoid arthritis

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2009)
  • H. Schotte et al.

    Long-term treatment with etanercept significantly reduces the number of pro-inflammatory cytokine-secreting peripheral blood mononuclear cells in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

    Rheumatology (Oxford)

    (2004)
  • S. Drynda et al.

    Soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor treatment does not affect raised transforming growth factor beta levels in rheumatoid arthritis

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2002)
  • F. Chopin et al.

    Long-term effects of infliximab on bone and cartilage turnover markers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2008)
  • H. Marotte et al.

    Effects of infliximab therapy on biological markers of synovium activity and cartilage breakdown in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2009)
  • M. Cuchacovich et al.

    Tumour necrosis factor (TNF)alpha −308 G/G promoter polymorphism and TNFalpha levels correlate with a better response to adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

    Scand J Rheumatol

    (2006)
  • H. Marotte et al.

    Association between the level of circulating bioactive tumor necrosis factor alpha and the tumor necrosis factor alpha gene polymorphism at −308 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with a tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2008)
  • N. Sekiguchi et al.

    Messenger ribonucleic acid expression profile in peripheral blood cells from RA patients following treatment with an anti-TNF-alpha monoclonal antibody, infliximab

    Rheumatology (Oxford)

    (2008)
  • I. Gonzalez-Alvaro et al.

    Baseline serum RANKL levels may serve to predict remission in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with TNF antagonists

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2007)
  • H. Marotte et al.

    Circulating tumour necrosis factor-alpha bioactivity in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with infliximab: link to clinical response

    Arthritis Res Ther

    (2005)
  • C. Trocme et al.

    Apolipoprotein A-I and platelet factor 4 are biomarkers for infliximab response in rheumatoid arthritis

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2009)
  • S. Fabre et al.

    Protein biochip array technology for cytokine profiling predicts etanercept responsiveness in rheumatoid arthritis

    Clin Exp Immunol

    (2008)
  • W. Hueber et al.

    Blood autoantibody and cytokine profiles predict response to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in rheumatoid arthritis

    Arthritis Res Ther

    (2009)
  • T.J. Smeets et al.

    Tumor necrosis factor alpha blockade reduces the synovial cell infiltrate early after initiation of treatment, but apparently not by induction of apoptosis in synovial tissue

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2003)
  • L. Wang et al.

    Apolipoprotein A-I inhibits chemotaxis, adhesion, activation of THP-1 cells and improves the plasma HDL inflammatory index

    Cytokine

    (2009)
  • T. Lequerre et al.

    Gene profiling in white blood cells predicts infliximab responsiveness in rheumatoid arthritis

    Arthritis Res Ther

    (2006)
  • D. Koczan et al.

    Molecular discrimination of responders and non-responders to anti-TNFalpha therapy in rheumatoid arthritis by etanercept

    Arthritis Res Ther

    (2008)
  • A. Pachot et al.

    Increased tumor necrosis factor-alpha mRNA expression in whole blood from patients with rheumatoid arthritis: reduction after infliximab treatment does not predict response

    J Rheumatol

    (2007)
  • M. Kawashima et al.

    Effect of treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with infliximab on IFN gamma, IL4, T-bet, and GATA-3 expression: link with improvement of systemic inflammation and disease activity

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2005)
  • M.L. Toh et al.

    Over-expression of synoviolin in peripheral blood and synoviocytes from rheumatoid arthritis patients and continued elevation in non-responders to infliximab treatment

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2006)
  • Cited by (40)

    • Prealbumin, platelet factor 4 and S100A12 combination at baseline predicts good response to TNF alpha inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis

      2019, Joint Bone Spine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, the ineffective use of biologics has a dramatic burden on the medico-economic resources regarding the important cost of these treatments [6]. Thus, the major current challenge in RA therapy is being able to predict drug responsiveness prior to treatment initiation [7], mainly by identifying relevant predictive biomarkers. In a previous study, we observed two distinct protein profiles in RA patients associated with a good or bad response to infliximab [8].

    • Biomarkers and osteoarthritis

      2019, Genomic and Precision Medicine: Infectious and Inflammatory Disease
    • Association of IL12B Gene Polymorphisms with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Meta-analysis

      2016, Archives of Medical Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      IL-12 has been shown to play a critical role in inducing T helper 1 (Th1) differentiation and initiating cell-mediated immune responses (8). IL-12 could induce the production of IL-1 and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), whose levels correlate well with activity markers of RA (9). It could also promote rheumatoid synovial T cells to produce interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) (10).

    • Biologic Markers in Clinical Trials and Clinical Care

      2016, Kelley and Firestein's Textbook of Rheumatology: Volumes 1-2, Tenth Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text