Perspective
The disease modifying osteoarthritis drug (DMOAD): Is it in the horizon?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2008.06.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Till date, the pharmaceutical industry has failed to bring effective and safe disease modifying osteoarthritic drugs (DMOADs) to the millions of patients suffering from this serious and deliberating disease. We provide a review of recent data reported on the investigation of DMOADs in clinical trials, including compounds inhibiting matrix-metalloproteinases (MMPs), bisphosphonates, cytokine blockers, calcitonin, inhibitors of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), doxycycline, glucosamine, and diacereine.

We discuss the challenges associated with the drug development process in general and with DMOADs in particular, and we advance the need for a new development paradigm for DMOADs. Two central elements in this paradigm are a stronger focus on the biology of the joint and the application of new and more sensitive biomarkers allowing redesign of clinical trials in osteoarthritis.

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the leading causes of disability in the world, with more than 10% of the elderly population having symptomatic disease [1]. The incidence increases with age, and by age 65 approximately 80% has radiographic evidence of OA [2]. Therefore, osteoarthritis is a serious burden both to the patient and the society. However, at present there is little to offer the affected individuals for prevention of the disease or treatment in the early stages [3]. For many patients, joint replacement is eventually the only treatment option.

Although the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis is not fully understood at present, it is evident that a central hallmark in this slow, chronic disease is progressive destruction of the articular joints, which consists of bone, cartilage and the synovium. In particular, the cartilage has attracted much attention, and the different grades and stages of OA cartilage histopathology have recently been described in detail by a working group under OARSI [4]. This system encompasses seven grades (or severity levels) with involvement of the deeper cartilage layers in more advanced OA disease, and when combined with the extent of cartilage involvement expressed in five stages this leads to a semi-quantitative scoring system of 0–24. Various skeletal features are included in radiographic assessment of OA [5] and in particular the involvement of subchondral bone remodeling in OA pathogenesis has been reported [6], [7]. The synovium, however, has attracted much less attention.

Current treatment options for OA patients are focused on relief from pain and improvement of joint function, including analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), as well as intra-articular injections of steroids and hyaluronans. Not surprisingly, these medical interventions have little effect – if any at all – on the structural degradation of joint tissue and therefore many patients eventually are faced with surgery as the only option to improve quality of life.

Based on the fact, that a central hallmark in the development of OA is the progressive destruction of the joint tissue, a reasonable approach to the development of an effective medical treatment seems to be the search for drugs with the ability to slow down this process, or maybe even arrest it completely. These drugs, termed disease modifying osteoarthritis drugs (DMOADs), are by nature different from the medical interventions referenced above.

However, a series of disappointing late-stage terminations of clinical trials investigating new potential DMOADs call for careful strategic considerations to improve the drug development process for this type of treatments.

In this review, we provide a brief introduction and perspective to the development of chondroprotective drugs which might be available in the not so distant future. Such treatment options are awaited by millions of patients with osteoarthritis.

Section snippets

Drug development in OA: do we need a new development paradigm?

Before we review the development of DMOADs, we would like to address a few critical issues relating to the drug development process in general and the process for DMOADs in particular.

From an efficacy point of view, regulatory approval of any drug is based on the ability to demonstrate in a statistically sound way the beneficial effects of the drug under investigation in a relevant and defined study population. The beneficial effects are determined on a few selected study end points, and are

DMOADs in development

Below we provide a brief summary of the most recent data originating from late stage drug development programmes with DMOADs, including MMP inhibitors, bisphosphonates, cytokine inhibitors, calcitonin, and nitric oxide synthase inhibitors. Other recent reviews have been published in this area [8], [25], [26], [27], [28].

Concluding remarks

Obviously, the unmet medical need for treatment options for patients suffering from OA is a dilemma of significant magnitude both for the patients and for the society. In this review, we have advanced the idea of a new development paradigm in osteoarthritis, which could assist in closing the gap between the enormous efforts spend every year in the pharmaceutical industry to develop DMOADs and then the medical need of the patients with OA. We have discussed the need for a more comprehensive

References (63)

  • M.P. Hudson et al.

    Effects of selective matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor (PG-116800) to prevent ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: results of the PREMIER (prevention of myocardial infarction early remodeling) trial

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2006)
  • T.L. Hurskainen et al.

    ADAM-TS5, ADAM-TS6, and ADAM-TS7, novel members of a new family of zinc metalloproteases. General features and genomic distribution of the ADAM-TS family

    J Biol Chem

    (1999)
  • R.M. Palmer et al.

    Induction of nitric oxide synthase in human chondrocytes

    Biochem Biophys Res Commun

    (1993)
  • M.A. Karsdal et al.

    Calcitonin is involved in cartilage homeostasis: is calcitonin a treatment for OA?

    Osteoarthritis Cartilage

    (2006)
  • J.Y. Reginster et al.

    Long-term effects of glucosamine sulphate on osteoarthritis progression: a randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial

    Lancet

    (2001)
  • A.D. Woolf et al.

    Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions

    Bull World Health Organ

    (2003)
  • R.C. Lawrence et al.

    Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the United States

    Arthritis Rheum

    (1998)
  • M.B. Goldring et al.

    Osteoarthritis

    J Cell Physiol

    (2007)
  • J.H. Kellgren et al.

    Osteo-arthrosis and disk degeneration in an urban population

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (1958)
  • S. Krasnokutsky et al.

    Osteoarthritis in 2007

    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis

    (2007)
  • C.O. Bingham et al.

    Risedronate decreases biochemical markers of cartilage degradation but does not decrease symptoms or slow radiographic progression in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee: results of the two-year multinational knee osteoarthritis structural arthritis study

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2006)
  • P. Krzeski et al.

    Development of musculoskeletal toxicity without clear benefit after administration of PG-116800, a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, to patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomised, 12-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2007)
  • M. Reijman et al.

    A new marker for osteoarthritis: cross-sectional and longitudinal approach

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2004)
  • A.E. Wluka et al.

    How does tibial cartilage volume relate to symptoms in subjects with knee osteoarthritis?

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2004)
  • F.M. Cicuttini et al.

    Rate of cartilage loss at two years predicts subsequent total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2004)
  • J.C. Rousseau et al.

    Biological markers in osteoarthritis

    Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol

    (2007)
  • P.G. Garnero

    New biochemical markers of cartilage turnover in osteoarthritis: recent developments and remaining challenges

    BoneKey-Osteovision

    (2007)
  • J.D. Birmingham et al.

    Collagen biomarkers in arthritis applications

    Biomarker Insights

    (2006)
  • S. Schaller et al.

    In vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo methodological approaches for studying therapeutic targets of osteoporosis and degenerative joint diseases: how biomarkers can assist?

    Assay Drug Dev Technol

    (2005)
  • D.K. Dedrick et al.

    A longitudinal study of subchondral plate and trabecular bone in cruciate-deficient dogs with osteoarthritis followed up for 54 months

    Arthritis Rheum

    (1993)
  • K.D. Brandt et al.

    Lessons learned from nine clinical trials of disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2005)
  • Cited by (0)

    Perspective articles contain the personal views of the authors who, as experts, reflect on the direction of future research in their field.

    View full text